BINC vs. BNDW
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW).
BINC and BNDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BINC is an actively managed fund by Blackrock. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023. BNDW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Float Adjusted TR Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BINC or BNDW.
Key characteristics
BINC | BNDW | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 5.18% | 2.22% |
1Y Return | 10.31% | 8.08% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.26 | 1.64 |
Sortino Ratio | 5.36 | 2.46 |
Omega Ratio | 1.73 | 1.29 |
Calmar Ratio | 8.19 | 0.59 |
Martin Ratio | 25.01 | 6.02 |
Ulcer Index | 0.42% | 1.33% |
Daily Std Dev | 3.20% | 4.88% |
Max Drawdown | -1.95% | -17.22% |
Current Drawdown | -0.77% | -6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINC and BNDW is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BINC vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 2.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BINC vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BINC vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BINC vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison
BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than BNDW's 4.17% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF | 5.54% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.17% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
BINC vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -1.95%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and BNDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BINC vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) is 0.68%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.