PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BINC vs. BNDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BINC and BNDW is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

BINC vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.50%
0.34%
BINC
BNDW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BINC:

3.18

BNDW:

1.20

Sortino Ratio

BINC:

4.81

BNDW:

1.76

Omega Ratio

BINC:

1.65

BNDW:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

BINC:

5.82

BNDW:

0.47

Martin Ratio

BINC:

18.15

BNDW:

4.23

Ulcer Index

BINC:

0.40%

BNDW:

1.21%

Daily Std Dev

BINC:

2.29%

BNDW:

4.25%

Max Drawdown

BINC:

-1.95%

BNDW:

-17.22%

Current Drawdown

BINC:

0.00%

BNDW:

-5.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 1.07% return.


BINC

YTD

1.55%

1M

0.93%

6M

2.50%

1Y

7.15%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BNDW

YTD

1.07%

1M

1.21%

6M

0.35%

1Y

4.92%

5Y*

-0.43%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BINC vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.06% expense ratio.


BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for BINC: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for BNDW: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BINC vs. BNDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BINC is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BINC is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BINC is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BINC is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BINC is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BINC is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BNDW is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BNDW is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BNDW is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BNDW is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BNDW is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BNDW is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BINC vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BINC, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.181.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for BINC, currently valued at 4.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.811.76
The chart of Omega ratio for BINC, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.651.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for BINC, currently valued at 5.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.005.821.66
The chart of Martin ratio for BINC, currently valued at 18.15, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.154.23
BINC
BNDW

The current BINC Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINC and BNDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.18
1.20
BINC
BNDW

Dividends

BINC vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than BNDW's 3.91% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF
6.38%6.13%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
3.91%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%

Drawdowns

BINC vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -1.95%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and BNDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-3.50%-3.00%-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-0.91%
BINC
BNDW

Volatility

BINC vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) is 0.50%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.50%
1.14%
BINC
BNDW
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab