PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BINC vs. BNDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BINCBNDW
YTD Return5.18%2.22%
1Y Return10.31%8.08%
Sharpe Ratio3.261.64
Sortino Ratio5.362.46
Omega Ratio1.731.29
Calmar Ratio8.190.59
Martin Ratio25.016.02
Ulcer Index0.42%1.33%
Daily Std Dev3.20%4.88%
Max Drawdown-1.95%-17.22%
Current Drawdown-0.77%-6.55%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between BINC and BNDW is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BINC vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 2.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.01%
3.43%
BINC
BNDW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BINC vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.06% expense ratio.


BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for BINC: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for BNDW: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BINC vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BINC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BINC, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BINC, currently valued at 5.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BINC, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.73
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BINC, currently valued at 8.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.008.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BINC, currently valued at 25.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0025.01
BNDW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 6.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.02

BINC vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINC Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINC and BNDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.26
1.64
BINC
BNDW

Dividends

BINC vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than BNDW's 4.17% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF
5.54%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.17%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%

Drawdowns

BINC vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -1.95%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and BNDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.77%
-2.15%
BINC
BNDW

Volatility

BINC vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) is 0.68%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.68%
1.31%
BINC
BNDW