BILZ vs. CDX
BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and CDX (Simplify High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BILZ returned 4.63%/yr vs 7.17%/yr for CDX. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BILZ charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CDX.
Performance
BILZ vs. CDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILZ achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -3.00% return.
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.65%
CDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -3.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.21M | $18.47M | $22.55M | |
| $2.23M | $2.17M | $2.98M |
BILZ vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.08% | 4.21% | 5.25% | 2.87% |
CDX Simplify High Yield ETF | -3.00% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 7.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILZ and CDX is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILZ vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank
BILZ
CDX
BILZ vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILZ | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +117.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 44.52 | 0.92 | +43.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 196.19 | -0.60 | +196.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,864.61 | -1.44 | +1,866.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILZ vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILZ drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum CDX drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILZ and CDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILZ | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -13.24% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -5.37% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.17% | -8.97% | +8.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.94% | +7.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -4.44% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.24% | -2.24% |
Volatility
BILZ vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) is 0.06%, while Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that BILZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILZ | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 2.02% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.15% | 5.16% | -5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21% | 5.98% | -5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 10.97% | -10.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 10.97% | -10.46% |
BILZ vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILZ has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BILZ vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison
BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than CDX's 8.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 3.64% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
CDX Simplify High Yield ETF | 8.33% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILZ and CDX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to BILZ (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILZ dropped -0.52% vs CDX's -13.24%.
On 3-year performance, CDX leads with 7.17% vs 4.63% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CDX has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 4.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CDX.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.33%, compared with 3.64% for BILZ.
BILZ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CDX is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BILZ and 0.25% for CDX.
BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.44 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILZ and CDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer