PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BILS vs. XLU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BILSXLU
YTD Return4.51%26.82%
1Y Return5.28%36.03%
3Y Return (Ann)3.43%8.97%
Sharpe Ratio18.402.14
Sortino Ratio96.672.98
Omega Ratio32.011.37
Calmar Ratio132.111.66
Martin Ratio1,354.0410.62
Ulcer Index0.00%3.24%
Daily Std Dev0.29%16.05%
Max Drawdown-0.41%-52.27%
Current Drawdown0.00%-4.52%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between BILS and XLU is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BILS vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BILS achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 26.82% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.67%
9.83%
BILS
XLU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BILS vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
Expense ratio chart for BILS: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%
Expense ratio chart for XLU: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BILS vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BILS, currently valued at 18.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.0018.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BILS, currently valued at 96.67, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0096.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BILS, currently valued at 32.01, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.0032.01
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BILS, currently valued at 132.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00132.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BILS, currently valued at 1354.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001,354.04
XLU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLU, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLU, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLU, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLU, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLU, currently valued at 11.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.08

BILS vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILS Sharpe Ratio is 18.40, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILS and XLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.0015.0020.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.40
2.25
BILS
XLU

Dividends

BILS vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than XLU's 2.82% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
5.14%4.98%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.82%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.42%3.67%3.19%3.86%

Drawdowns

BILS vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILS drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILS and XLU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-4.52%
BILS
XLU

Volatility

BILS vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) is 0.08%, while Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that BILS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.08%
5.59%
BILS
XLU