BILS vs. GBIL
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL).
BILS and GBIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BILS is a passively managed fund by SPDR that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020. GBIL is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2016. Both BILS and GBIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BILS or GBIL.
Correlation
The correlation between BILS and GBIL is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BILS vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BILS:
10.18
GBIL:
4.68
BILS:
12.99
GBIL:
6.70
BILS:
9.75
GBIL:
6.60
BILS:
13.46
GBIL:
6.88
BILS:
104.57
GBIL:
29.28
BILS:
0.05%
GBIL:
0.18%
BILS:
0.48%
GBIL:
1.11%
BILS:
-0.41%
GBIL:
-0.76%
BILS:
-0.28%
GBIL:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILS achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 5.03% return.
BILS
4.65%
0.07%
2.25%
4.79%
N/A
N/A
GBIL
5.03%
0.43%
2.60%
5.14%
2.33%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BILS vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BILS vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BILS vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than GBIL's 4.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.64% | 4.98% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 4.99% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
BILS vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILS drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum GBIL drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILS and GBIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BILS vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that BILS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.