PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILL vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BILL vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILL achieves a -13.42% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -29.45% return.


BILL

1D
4.63%
1M
16.65%
6M
13.43%
YTD
-13.42%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
-25.74%
5Y*
-25.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.64%

CRM

1D
1.05%
1M
11.94%
6M
-11.34%
YTD
-29.45%
1Y
-25.21%
3Y*
-4.12%
5Y*
-4.98%
10Y*
8.81%
ALL TIME*
19.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$104.99M$102.12M$107.52M
$2.36B$2.19B$2.59B

BILL vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BILL
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.
-13.42%-35.62%3.82%-25.12%-56.27%82.53%258.74%2.15%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-29.45%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BILL and CRM is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2019

0.55

The correlation between BILL and CRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BILL:

$4.70B

CRM:

$152.29B

EPS

BILL:

$0.00

CRM:

$8.68

PE Ratio

BILL:

29.50K

CRM:

21.42

PS Ratio

BILL:

3.00

CRM:

4.01

PB Ratio

BILL:

1.27

CRM:

4.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

BILL:

$1.60B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BILL:

$1.29B

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

BILL:

$68.77M

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILL vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BILL
BILL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BILL vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILLCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.92

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

-0.58

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

-1.07

+1.67

BILL vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILL Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILL and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILL vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILL drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILL and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILLCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.66%

-70.50%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.24%

-43.33%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.96%

-58.67%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.66%

-58.67%

-31.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.20%

-48.81%

-37.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-16.38%

-39.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.15%

23.58%

-1.43%

Volatility

BILL vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) at 14.35%. This indicates that BILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILLCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.53%

14.35%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.82%

33.53%

+17.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.08%

41.04%

+24.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.84%

37.79%

+33.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.64%

35.72%

+36.92%

Dividends

BILL vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

BILL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024
BILL
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%

Financials

BILL vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bill.com Holdings, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BILL vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bill.com Holdings, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BILL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bill.com Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.85M and revenue of 406.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

BILL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bill.com Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 96.41M and revenue of 406.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

BILL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bill.com Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 12.79M and revenue of 406.56M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BILL and CRM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILL has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to CRM (14.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILL dropped -90.66% vs CRM's -70.50%.

BILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILL and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer