BIGZ vs. CRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BIGZ or CRT.
Key characteristics
BIGZ | CRT | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 15.56% | -38.84% |
1Y Return | 25.79% | -44.76% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -16.34% | -1.65% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.36 | -1.09 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.92 | -1.66 |
Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 0.80 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.42 | -0.65 |
Martin Ratio | 4.57 | -1.25 |
Ulcer Index | 5.77% | 34.44% |
Daily Std Dev | 19.42% | 39.72% |
Max Drawdown | -67.28% | -83.46% |
Current Drawdown | -52.59% | -61.34% |
Fundamentals
BIGZ | CRT | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.70B | $60.30M |
EPS | $0.89 | $1.28 |
PE Ratio | 8.71 | 7.85 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIGZ and CRT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BIGZ vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BIGZ achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -38.84% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BIGZ vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BIGZ vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
BIGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, less than CRT's 10.73% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust | 9.68% | 10.45% | 14.54% | 4.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.73% | 10.97% | 7.69% | 9.70% | 9.44% | 10.05% | 13.08% | 6.86% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.33% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
BIGZ vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIGZ drawdown since its inception was -67.28%, smaller than the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGZ and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BIGZ vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ) is 4.97%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that BIGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BIGZ vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities