PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BIGT vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BIGT and XLG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

BIGT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (BIGT) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
29.26%
11.86%
BIGT
XLG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BIGT:

2.87

XLG:

2.42

Sortino Ratio

BIGT:

3.47

XLG:

3.13

Omega Ratio

BIGT:

1.47

XLG:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

BIGT:

4.06

XLG:

3.22

Martin Ratio

BIGT:

13.14

XLG:

13.27

Ulcer Index

BIGT:

5.59%

XLG:

2.75%

Daily Std Dev

BIGT:

25.54%

XLG:

15.08%

Max Drawdown

BIGT:

-18.10%

XLG:

-52.39%

Current Drawdown

BIGT:

-0.27%

XLG:

-0.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIGT achieves a 73.63% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 36.25% return.


BIGT

YTD

73.63%

1M

13.79%

6M

29.27%

1Y

73.40%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLG

YTD

36.25%

1M

3.99%

6M

12.99%

1Y

36.57%

5Y*

18.40%

10Y*

15.28%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIGT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIGT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


BIGT
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Expense ratio chart for BIGT: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%
Expense ratio chart for XLG: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIGT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (BIGT) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIGT, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.872.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIGT, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.473.14
The chart of Omega ratio for BIGT, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.471.45
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIGT, currently valued at 4.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.063.23
The chart of Martin ratio for BIGT, currently valued at 13.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.1413.30
BIGT
XLG

The current BIGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIGT and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.87
2.43
BIGT
XLG

Dividends

BIGT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

BIGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than XLG's 0.71% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BIGT
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
0.25%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.71%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%1.97%

Drawdowns

BIGT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIGT drawdown since its inception was -18.10%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGT and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.27%
-0.99%
BIGT
XLG

Volatility

BIGT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (BIGT) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.19%. This indicates that BIGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.29%
4.19%
BIGT
XLG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab