PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIGRX vs. FSPHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Disciplined Core Value Fund (BIGRX) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIGRX achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than FSPHX's -5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BIGRX has outperformed FSPHX with an annualized return of 11.30%, while FSPHX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.


BIGRX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.76%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
11.30%

FSPHX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
-12.69%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
3.11%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIGRX
American Century Disciplined Core Value Fund
11.88%14.85%13.26%8.44%-12.59%24.22%11.86%24.00%-6.37%20.63%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
-5.41%9.36%4.91%4.13%-12.82%11.58%24.57%31.48%7.15%23.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BIGRX and FSPHX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1990

0.73

The correlation between BIGRX and FSPHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIGRX vs. FSPHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIGRX
BIGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BIGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPHX
FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Disciplined Core Value Fund (BIGRX) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIGRXFSPHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.08

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

0.38

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.59

0.85

+14.74

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the FSPHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIGRX and FSPHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIGRXFSPHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

0.40

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.06

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.44

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.75

-0.17

Drawdowns

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.04%, which is greater than FSPHX's maximum drawdown of -44.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGRX and FSPHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIGRXFSPHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.04%

-44.45%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-18.32%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.24%

-18.32%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-29.31%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.62%

-29.31%

-3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.46%

+14.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-9.83%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

8.20%

-6.32%

Volatility

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Disciplined Core Value Fund (BIGRX) is 2.91%, while Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that BIGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIGRXFSPHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

5.10%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

14.42%

-6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

17.61%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

18.32%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

19.02%

-2.20%

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIGRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPHX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIGRX vs. FSPHX - Dividend Comparison

BIGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than FSPHX's 12.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIGRX
American Century Disciplined Core Value Fund
8.09%9.05%1.32%1.55%1.88%28.04%16.19%3.90%13.40%9.32%3.91%9.22%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
12.88%4.16%10.77%0.00%2.13%9.06%11.29%1.35%9.02%2.27%0.18%11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIGRX and FSPHX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPHX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to BIGRX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIGRX dropped -58.04% vs FSPHX's -44.45%.

BIGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIGRX and FSPHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer