PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIBL vs. SCHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BIBL vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BIBL vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
6.10%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%10.90%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
-0.10%5.50%-6.44%3.43%-29.44%-4.86%17.73%-4.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -0.10% return.


BIBL

1D
1.12%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
6.10%
6M
7.52%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*

SCHQ

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.76%
1Y
-0.34%
3Y*
-1.57%
5Y*
-4.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIBL vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BIBL vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHQ
SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBL vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIBLSCHQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

-0.03

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

0.03

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.00

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

0.04

+1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

0.10

+8.59

BIBL vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBL and SCHQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIBLSCHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-0.03

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

-0.33

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

-0.25

+0.79

Correlation

The correlation between BIBL and SCHQ is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

BIBL vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than SCHQ's 4.73% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.11%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
4.73%4.54%4.58%3.79%2.88%1.69%1.51%0.44%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BIBL vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and SCHQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BIBLSCHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-46.13%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.93%

-8.46%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

-40.93%

+10.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-36.61%

+31.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-26.08%

+18.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.88%

-0.93%

Volatility

BIBL vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) at 3.46%. This indicates that BIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BIBLSCHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

3.46%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

5.99%

+6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

10.36%

+10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.44%

14.55%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

15.48%

+5.67%