BIBL vs. AMLP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIBL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Inspire 100 Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BIBL returned 9.44%/yr vs 16.98%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.

Performance

BIBL vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 16.71% return.

BIBL

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 20.10%
• 6M: 18.49%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: —

AMLP

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 16.71%
• 6M: 14.37%
• 1Y: 18.65%
• 3Y*: 20.21%
• 5Y*: 16.98%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBL vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	20.10%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	27.44%	22.62%	29.68%	-7.64%	4.38%
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	16.71%	5.78%	22.76%	21.40%	25.47%	39.09%	-32.26%	5.99%	-12.67%	2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBL and AMLP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between BIBL and AMLP has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BIBL vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BIBL	AMLP
Technology	30.1%	-
Industrials	26.8%	-
Real Estate	14.7%	-
Financial Services	8.3%	-
Energy	6.9%	97.7%
Healthcare	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	-
Utilities	3.5%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	-
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

BIBL vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 77
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

AMLP

AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 45
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBL vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIBL	AMLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.59	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.22	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.27	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.09	2.10	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	6.93	+10.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIBL vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBL and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIBL	AMLP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	1.59	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.85	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.23	+0.38

Drawdowns

BIBL vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and AMLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIBL	AMLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.12%	-77.19%	+41.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-8.94%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.60%	-14.27%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	-20.92%	-9.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-3.77%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.04%	-17.39%	+10.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.70%	-0.63%

Volatility

BIBL vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.68%. This indicates that BIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIBL	AMLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	4.68%	+1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.07%	8.68%	+4.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.82%	11.81%	+4.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.63%	19.99%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.10%	27.67%	-6.57%

BIBL vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIBL vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than AMLP's 7.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	7.62%	8.36%	7.70%	7.86%	7.70%	8.55%	12.31%	9.12%	9.29%	7.97%	8.09%	9.84%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.98%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIBL and AMLP in my portfolio?

BIBL and AMLP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIBL or AMLP?

BIBL has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to AMLP (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBL dropped -36.12% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

Which ETF is better, BIBL or AMLP?

On 5-year performance, AMLP leads with 16.98% vs 9.44% for BIBL. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BIBL or AMLP?

Over the 5-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 16.98% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIBL or AMLP?

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIBL or AMLP?

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 0.98% for BIBL.

What is the main difference between BIBL and AMLP?

BIBL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BIBL and 0.90% for AMLP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.