BIBL vs. AMLP
Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP).
BIBL and AMLP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BIBL is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2017. AMLP is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 23, 2010. Both BIBL and AMLP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BIBL vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIBL vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 4.92% | 17.27% | 12.49% | 17.87% | -23.26% | 27.44% | 22.62% | 29.68% | -7.64% | 4.38% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 14.20% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | 2.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 14.20% return.
BIBL
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
AMLP
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 9.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIBL vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIBL vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
BIBL
AMLP
BIBL vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIBL | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.62 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 0.89 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.68 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 1.72 | +6.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIBL | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.62 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 1.02 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.22 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIBL and AMLP is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BIBL vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than AMLP's 7.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 1.12% | 1.01% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 0.98% | 17.87% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.49% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.54% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
Drawdowns
BIBL vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and AMLP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIBL | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -77.19% | +41.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.93% | -14.27% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -20.92% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.01% | -2.17% | -3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -17.57% | +10.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 5.60% | -2.67% |
Volatility
BIBL vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 2.92%. This indicates that BIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIBL | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 2.92% | +3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 7.86% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.37% | 16.08% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 20.18% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 27.84% | -6.69% |