PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHV vs. ECCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHV vs. ECCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust (BHV) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHV achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly higher than ECCC's 1.93% return.


BHV

1D
0.90%
1M
3.62%
YTD
14.87%
6M
9.25%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
-3.97%
10Y*
-0.96%

ECCC

1D
0.29%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.93%
6M
7.38%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHV vs. ECCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BHV
BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust
14.87%0.74%5.98%-1.10%-36.11%5.06%
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
1.93%16.21%14.03%14.18%-13.45%5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BHV and ECCC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BHV:

$18.67M

ECCC:

$3.24B

EPS

BHV:

$0.16

ECCC:

-$0.97

PS Ratio

BHV:

8.24

ECCC:

18.80

PB Ratio

BHV:

1.02

ECCC:

4.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHV:

$2.27M

ECCC:

$162.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHV:

$1.81M

ECCC:

$143.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

BHV:

$636.06K

ECCC:

-$35.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHV vs. ECCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHV
BHV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ECCC
ECCC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ECCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ECCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHV vs. ECCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust (BHV) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BHVECCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.78

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

10.44

-4.79

BHV vs. ECCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHV Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the ECCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHV and ECCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BHVECCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.58

-0.41

Drawdowns

BHV vs. ECCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than ECCC's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHV and ECCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHVECCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.61%

-19.16%

-36.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-4.29%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-6.88%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.23%

-1.04%

-32.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.69%

-3.72%

-11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

1.55%

+2.13%

Volatility

BHV vs. ECCC - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust (BHV) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHVECCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

4.17%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

8.37%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

11.24%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

12.24%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

12.24%

+11.04%

Dividends

BHV vs. ECCC - Dividend Comparison

BHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than ECCC's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHV
BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust
4.95%5.86%4.64%3.10%4.50%2.97%3.43%3.55%4.85%4.52%5.12%3.89%
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6.61%6.55%7.10%7.81%7.95%3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BHV vs. ECCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M-50.00M0.0050.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
685.82K
-12.96M
(BHV) Total Revenue
(ECCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BHV and ECCC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECCC has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to BHV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHV dropped -55.61% vs ECCC's -19.16%.

ECCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHV and ECCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer