PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHR vs. APLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHR vs. APLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (BHR) and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHR achieves a -33.10% return, which is significantly lower than APLE's 47.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BHR has underperformed APLE with an annualized return of -14.26%, while APLE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.04% annualized return.


BHR

1D
-4.95%
1M
-23.81%
YTD
-33.10%
6M
-32.17%
1Y
-20.46%
3Y*
-15.70%
5Y*
-16.35%
10Y*
-14.26%

APLE

1D
1.74%
1M
14.93%
YTD
47.45%
6M
45.49%
1Y
58.37%
3Y*
12.80%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
5.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHR vs. APLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHR
Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
-33.10%3.02%29.59%-35.17%-17.90%10.63%-48.38%8.84%-2.17%-23.98%
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
47.45%-16.61%-1.26%12.31%2.41%25.42%-18.91%21.97%-21.64%3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BHR and APLE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2015

0.52

The correlation between BHR and APLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BHR:

$192.55M

APLE:

$4.00B

EPS

BHR:

-$0.16

APLE:

$0.72

PS Ratio

BHR:

0.21

APLE:

2.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHR:

$697.18M

APLE:

$1.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHR:

-$87.68M

APLE:

$673.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

BHR:

$127.89M

APLE:

$388.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHR vs. APLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHR
BHR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

APLE
APLE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
APLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
APLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHR vs. APLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (BHR) and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHRAPLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.41

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

4.35

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

10.08

-11.41

BHR vs. APLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHR Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the APLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHR and APLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHR vs. APLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHR drawdown since its inception was -93.49%, which is greater than APLE's maximum drawdown of -71.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHR and APLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHRAPLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.49%

-71.83%

-21.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.85%

-13.49%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.92%

-32.95%

-19.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.66%

-32.95%

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.14%

-71.83%

-19.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.28%

0.00%

-86.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.39%

-12.34%

-47.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.41%

5.81%

+9.60%

Volatility

BHR vs. APLE - Volatility Comparison

Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (BHR) has a higher volatility of 17.31% compared to Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) at 5.44%. This indicates that BHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHRAPLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.31%

5.44%

+11.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.78%

16.65%

+18.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.15%

22.96%

+27.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.00%

27.27%

+26.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.27%

34.56%

+31.71%

Dividends

BHR vs. APLE - Dividend Comparison

BHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than APLE's 5.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
5.67%8.10%6.58%6.08%4.82%0.25%2.32%6.77%9.12%5.61%6.01%4.01%
BHR
Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
7.81%6.97%6.67%8.00%1.95%0.00%0.00%8.23%7.17%6.58%3.37%2.41%

Financials

BHR vs. APLE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
208.98M
337.74M
(BHR) Total Revenue
(APLE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BHR vs. APLE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
73.8%
Portfolio components
BHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 208.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

APLE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 249.08M and revenue of 337.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.

BHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.62M and revenue of 208.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

APLE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported an operating income of 48.01M and revenue of 337.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

BHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 20.87M and revenue of 208.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

APLE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported a net income of 27.70M and revenue of 337.74M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BHR and APLE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHR has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to APLE (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHR dropped -93.49% vs APLE's -71.83%.

APLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHR and APLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer