PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BHP vs. CF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BHPCF
YTD Return-11.09%0.34%
1Y Return9.35%12.06%
3Y Return (Ann)2.24%21.15%
5Y Return (Ann)10.75%14.76%
10Y Return (Ann)5.64%8.10%
Sharpe Ratio0.220.30
Daily Std Dev25.75%29.24%
Max Drawdown-75.95%-76.73%
Current Drawdown-11.84%-30.94%

Fundamentals


BHPCF
Market Cap$147.17B$14.92B
EPS$2.91$7.87
PE Ratio19.9710.10
PEG Ratio0.000.64
Revenue (TTM)$55.66B$6.63B
Gross Profit (TTM)$43.24B$5.86B
EBITDA (TTM)$26.85B$3.13B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between BHP and CF is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BHP vs. CF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BHP achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than CF's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BHP has underperformed CF with an annualized return of 5.64%, while CF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.10% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.17%
-0.88%
BHP
CF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BHP Group

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BHP vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BHP Group (BHP) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BHP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BHP, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.000.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.60
CF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CF, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CF, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CF, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CF, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.000.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CF, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.15

BHP vs. CF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which roughly equals the CF Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BHP and CF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.22
0.30
BHP
CF

Dividends

BHP vs. CF - Dividend Comparison

BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than CF's 2.15% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BHP
BHP Group
5.13%4.98%10.27%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.32%5.11%3.40%
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
2.15%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%1.83%0.94%

Drawdowns

BHP vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHP drawdown since its inception was -75.95%, roughly equal to the maximum CF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHP and CF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-11.84%
-30.94%
BHP
CF

Volatility

BHP vs. CF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BHP Group (BHP) is 7.26%, while CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that BHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.26%
9.17%
BHP
CF

Financials

BHP vs. CF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BHP Group and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items