PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHK vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BHK vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHK achieves a -2.76% return, which is significantly lower than VGLT's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BHK has outperformed VGLT with an annualized return of 3.00%, while VGLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.10% annualized return.


BHK

1D
-0.78%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-2.76%
6M
-1.69%
1Y
-0.09%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
-3.11%
10Y*
3.00%

VGLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
-1.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHK vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHK
BlackRock Core Bond Trust
-2.76%2.51%4.02%14.42%-32.52%8.03%18.02%26.36%-7.59%14.22%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-0.41%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BHK and VGLT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2009

0.31

Over the past year, BHK and VGLT have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHK vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHK
BHK Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHK Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHK Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHK vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BHKVGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.10

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

0.75

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

1.96

-1.99

BHK vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHK Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the VGLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHK and VGLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BHKVGLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

0.59

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.37

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

-0.08

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.19

+0.21

Drawdowns

BHK vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHK drawdown since its inception was -39.59%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHK and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHKVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.59%

-46.18%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-7.01%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-17.68%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.59%

-40.98%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.59%

-46.18%

+6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.10%

-36.83%

+15.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-15.06%

+7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.68%

+0.53%

Volatility

BHK vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) at 2.59%. This indicates that BHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHKVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

2.59%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

5.94%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15%

8.88%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

14.58%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.11%

13.81%

-0.70%

Dividends

BHK vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

BHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, more than VGLT's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHK
BlackRock Core Bond Trust
9.99%9.25%8.56%8.21%7.91%6.36%5.06%5.32%6.39%5.56%6.23%7.03%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.61%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BHK and VGLT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHK has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to VGLT (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHK dropped -39.59% vs VGLT's -46.18%.

VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHK and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer