BHK vs. VGLT
BHK (BlackRock Core Bond Trust) is a stock, while VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Over the past 10 years, BHK returned 3.00%/yr vs -1.10%/yr for VGLT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BHK vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHK achieves a -2.76% return, which is significantly lower than VGLT's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BHK has outperformed VGLT with an annualized return of 3.00%, while VGLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.10% annualized return.
BHK
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- -0.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- -3.11%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.30%
- 10Y*
- -1.10%
BHK vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHK BlackRock Core Bond Trust | -2.76% | 2.51% | 4.02% | 14.42% | -32.52% | 8.03% | 18.02% | 26.36% | -7.59% | 14.22% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -0.41% | 5.35% | -6.28% | 3.27% | -29.34% | -4.98% | 17.57% | 14.30% | -1.54% | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHK and VGLT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2009 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, BHK and VGLT have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHK vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank
BHK
VGLT
BHK vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BHK | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.10 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.75 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 1.96 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BHK | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.59 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | -0.37 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | -0.08 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.19 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
BHK vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHK drawdown since its inception was -39.59%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHK and VGLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHK | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.59% | -46.18% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -7.01% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.73% | -17.68% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.59% | -40.98% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.59% | -46.18% | +6.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.10% | -36.83% | +15.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -15.06% | +7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 2.68% | +0.53% |
Volatility
BHK vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) at 2.59%. This indicates that BHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHK | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 2.59% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 5.94% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.15% | 8.88% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 14.58% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 13.81% | -0.70% |
Dividends
BHK vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison
BHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, more than VGLT's 4.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHK BlackRock Core Bond Trust | 9.99% | 9.25% | 8.56% | 8.21% | 7.91% | 6.36% | 5.06% | 5.32% | 6.39% | 5.56% | 6.23% | 7.03% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.61% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BHK and VGLT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BHK has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to VGLT (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHK dropped -39.59% vs VGLT's -46.18%.
VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BHK and VGLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer