BHK vs. BLV
BHK (BlackRock Core Bond Trust) is a stock, while BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) is Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, BHK returned 2.76%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for BLV. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BHK vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHK achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than BLV's -2.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BHK has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 2.76%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 0.32% annualized return.
BHK
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 2.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- -3.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.46%
BLV
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 1Y
- -0.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.08%
- 5Y*
- -5.11%
- 10Y*
- 0.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37M | $3.11M | $2.86M | |
| $51.99M | $52.76M | $45.16M |
BHK vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHK BlackRock Core Bond Trust | -0.92% | 2.51% | 4.02% | 14.42% | -32.52% | 8.03% | 18.02% | 26.36% | -7.59% | 14.22% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | -2.38% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | 18.99% | -4.17% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHK and BLV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, BHK and BLV have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHK vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank
BHK
BLV
BHK vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BHK | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.00 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | -0.05 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | -0.11 | +0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BHK vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHK drawdown since its inception was -39.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHK and BLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHK | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.59% | -38.29% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -5.92% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.73% | -11.70% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.59% | -36.27% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.59% | -38.29% | -1.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.60% | -26.16% | +6.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -9.64% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 2.66% | +0.92% |
Volatility
BHK vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 2.19%. This indicates that BHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHK | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 2.19% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 5.97% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.05% | 7.77% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 12.91% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 11.95% | +1.19% |
Dividends
BHK vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
BHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than BLV's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHK BlackRock Core Bond Trust | 9.97% | 9.25% | 8.56% | 8.21% | 7.91% | 6.36% | 5.06% | 5.32% | 6.39% | 5.56% | 6.23% | 7.03% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.97% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BHK and BLV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BHK has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to BLV (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHK dropped -39.59% vs BLV's -38.29%.
BHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BHK and BLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer