BHK vs. BLV
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV).
BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Performance
BHK vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BHK vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHK BlackRock Core Bond Trust | -2.31% | 2.51% | 4.02% | 14.42% | -32.52% | 8.03% | 18.02% | 26.36% | -7.59% | 14.22% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | -0.30% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | 18.99% | -4.17% | 10.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHK achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly lower than BLV's -0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, BHK has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 3.37%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.20% annualized return.
BHK
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -4.41%
- 1Y
- -5.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.37%
BLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.71%
- 3Y*
- 1.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHK vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank
BHK
BLV
BHK vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BHK | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | 0.18 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | 0.30 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.34 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 0.83 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BHK | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 0.18 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | -0.24 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.10 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.37 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BHK and BLV is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BHK vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
BHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.75%, more than BLV's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHK BlackRock Core Bond Trust | 9.75% | 9.25% | 8.56% | 8.21% | 7.91% | 6.36% | 5.06% | 5.32% | 6.39% | 5.56% | 6.23% | 7.03% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
Drawdowns
BHK vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHK drawdown since its inception was -39.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHK and BLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHK | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.59% | -38.29% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -6.89% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.59% | -36.27% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.59% | -38.29% | -1.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.73% | -24.58% | +3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -9.38% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.98% | 2.85% | +3.13% |
Volatility
BHK vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BHK | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.54% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 5.49% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 9.75% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 12.97% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 11.99% | +1.07% |