BGT vs. HYG
BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both funds - BGT is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Over the past 10 years, BGT returned 6.36%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for HYG. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGT charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
BGT vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 6.36%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.99% annualized return.
BGT
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- -2.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
HYG
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.99%
BGT vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | -0.21% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.54% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and HYG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
HYG
BGT vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGT | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.28 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.41 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 10.57 | -11.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGT vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -34.25% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -2.34% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -4.56% | -11.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -15.79% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -22.03% | -19.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -0.24% | -6.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -3.23% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 0.53% | +4.64% |
Volatility
BGT vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.13%. This indicates that BGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.13% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 3.11% | +3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 3.88% | +6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 7.54% | +6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 8.27% | +7.07% |
BGT vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGT vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.63%, more than HYG's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.63% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.91% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGT and HYG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGT has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to HYG (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs HYG's -34.25%.
HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGT and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer