PortfoliosLab logo
BGT vs. BND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BGT and BND is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

BGT vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BGT:

0.22

BND:

0.88

Sortino Ratio

BGT:

0.42

BND:

1.16

Omega Ratio

BGT:

1.06

BND:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

BGT:

0.24

BND:

0.34

Martin Ratio

BGT:

0.99

BND:

2.01

Ulcer Index

BGT:

3.91%

BND:

2.11%

Daily Std Dev

BGT:

16.18%

BND:

5.33%

Max Drawdown

BGT:

-58.31%

BND:

-18.84%

Current Drawdown

BGT:

-3.88%

BND:

-7.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 6.69%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.


BGT

YTD

0.16%

1M

3.25%

6M

0.06%

1Y

5.24%

3Y*

14.54%

5Y*

12.39%

10Y*

6.69%

BND

YTD

1.68%

1M

-1.03%

6M

0.43%

1Y

4.55%

3Y*

1.26%

5Y*

-1.10%

10Y*

1.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BGT vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BGT vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGT is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGT is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGT is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGT is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGT is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGT is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BND is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BND is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BND is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BND is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BND is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BND is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BGT vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGT and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BGT vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%, more than BND's 3.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
11.76%11.22%10.36%6.87%5.55%7.58%6.33%6.64%5.03%5.44%6.04%6.65%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.77%3.67%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%

Drawdowns

BGT vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and BND.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BGT vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.45%. This indicates that BGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...