BGSF vs. SCHG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).

SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.

Performance

BGSF vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BGSF vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGSF BGSF, Inc.	39.74%	23.01%	-43.43%	-35.14%	11.74%	9.84%	-36.25%	12.07%	36.56%	9.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	-10.59%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGSF achieves a 39.74% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BGSF has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 0.10%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.

BGSF

• 1D: 3.69%
• 1M: 6.41%
• YTD: 39.74%
• 6M: 26.86%
• 1Y: 144.76%
• 3Y*: -3.51%
• 5Y*: -6.13%
• 10Y*: 0.10%

SCHG

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: -10.59%
• 6M: -8.51%
• 1Y: 16.81%
• 3Y*: 21.91%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: 16.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BGSF vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGSF

BGSF Risk / Return Rank: 89
BGSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BGSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BGSF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BGSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BGSF Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 46
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGSF vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGSF	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	0.75	+1.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	1.23	+1.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.17	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	1.03	+2.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	3.54	+4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGSF vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGSF and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGSF	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	0.75	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.57	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00	0.79	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.79	-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between BGSF and SCHG is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BGSF vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

BGSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.91%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGSF BGSF, Inc.	30.91%	43.20%	2.86%	6.38%	3.92%	3.07%	3.71%	5.48%	5.57%	6.27%	6.41%	5.02%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.43%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Drawdowns

BGSF vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGSF drawdown since its inception was -87.03%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGSF and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGSF	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.03%	-34.59%	-52.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.59%	-16.41%	-26.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.23%	-34.59%	-45.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.03%	-34.59%	-52.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.26%	-13.34%	-46.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.87%	-5.22%	-31.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.02%	4.78%	+13.24%

Volatility

BGSF vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.67%. This indicates that BGSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGSF	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.15%	6.67%	+3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.26%	12.51%	+19.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.22%	22.43%	+48.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.34%	22.32%	+26.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.51%	21.51%	+31.00%