PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BGR vs. CTA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BGR and CTA is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: -0.1

Performance

BGR vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
31.66%
34.71%
BGR
CTA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BGR:

0.00

CTA:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

BGR:

0.14

CTA:

1.12

Omega Ratio

BGR:

1.02

CTA:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

BGR:

0.00

CTA:

1.05

Martin Ratio

BGR:

0.02

CTA:

2.02

Ulcer Index

BGR:

4.44%

CTA:

4.46%

Daily Std Dev

BGR:

20.27%

CTA:

12.52%

Max Drawdown

BGR:

-72.56%

CTA:

-18.07%

Current Drawdown

BGR:

-10.92%

CTA:

-6.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGR achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 1.31% return.


BGR

YTD

-0.44%

1M

-8.90%

6M

-2.84%

1Y

-1.05%

5Y*

18.78%

10Y*

1.37%

CTA

YTD

1.31%

1M

-4.77%

6M

9.23%

1Y

8.23%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BGR vs. CTA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGR is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGR is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGR is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGR is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGR is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGR is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTA is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTA is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTA is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTA is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTA is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTA is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BGR vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BGR, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
BGR: 0.00
CTA: 0.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for BGR, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
BGR: 0.14
CTA: 1.12
The chart of Omega ratio for BGR, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BGR: 1.02
CTA: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for BGR, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
BGR: 0.00
CTA: 1.05
The chart of Martin ratio for BGR, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
BGR: 0.02
CTA: 2.02

The current BGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGR and CTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.00
0.72
BGR
CTA

Dividends

BGR vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

BGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, more than CTA's 4.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BGR
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust
7.93%6.66%6.22%4.62%4.75%9.26%7.84%8.91%6.57%6.90%11.93%13.83%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.65%4.80%7.78%6.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BGR vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGR drawdown since its inception was -72.56%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGR and CTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.92%
-6.47%
BGR
CTA

Volatility

BGR vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) has a higher volatility of 14.12% compared to Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) at 4.47%. This indicates that BGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.12%
4.47%
BGR
CTA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab