PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGLD vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGLD vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 13.78% return.


BGLD

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.32%
6M
1.34%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*

VOOG

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.44%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLD vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
0.32%33.03%21.80%13.24%-2.42%-5.57%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.78%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLD and VOOG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGLD vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLD vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGLDVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.49

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

10.32

-6.60

BGLD vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLD and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGLDVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.16

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.76

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.91

+0.14

Drawdowns

BGLD vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, smaller than the maximum VOOG drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGLDVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-32.73%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-13.71%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

-22.18%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

-32.73%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-1.08%

-6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-4.97%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.31%

+0.18%

Volatility

BGLD vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) is 2.20%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that BGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGLDVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

4.32%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

12.41%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

15.85%

-3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

21.19%

-11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.89%

20.73%

-10.84%

BGLD vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGLD vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.18%, more than VOOG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
44.18%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGLD and VOOG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to BGLD (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLD dropped -16.19% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 5-year performance, VOOG leads with 16.03% vs 11.20% for BGLD. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BGLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.

BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 44.18%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.

BGLD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VOOG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for BGLD and 0.07% for VOOG.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGLD and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer