BGLD vs. FNILX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX).

BGLD is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Jan 20, 2021. FNILX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

BGLD vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BGLD vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	0.18%	33.03%	21.80%	13.24%	-2.42%	-5.57%
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	-7.30%	17.81%	25.47%	27.45%	-19.37%	23.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's -7.30% return.

BGLD

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -6.42%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 2.66%
• 1Y: 16.42%
• 3Y*: 20.21%
• 5Y*: 12.18%
• 10Y*: —

FNILX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -7.60%
• YTD: -7.30%
• 6M: -5.00%
• 1Y: 14.41%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLD vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.

BGLD

FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF

FNILX

Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund

Return for Risk

BGLD vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLD

BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 74
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FNILX

FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLD vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGLD	FNILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.83	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.28	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	1.04	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.80	5.01	+2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGLD vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLD and FNILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGLD	FNILX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	0.83	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.24	0.65	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.64	+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between BGLD and FNILX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BGLD vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.24%, more than FNILX's 1.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	44.24%	44.32%	25.04%	10.49%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	1.09%	1.01%	1.09%	1.34%	1.53%	0.95%	1.20%	1.17%	0.53%

Drawdowns

BGLD vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and FNILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGLD	FNILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.19%	-33.76%	+17.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.11%	-12.18%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.19%	-25.40%	+9.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.35%	-9.01%	+1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-5.47%	+1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	2.54%	-0.39%

Volatility

BGLD vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 4.23%. This indicates that BGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGLD	FNILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	4.23%	+2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.28%	9.14%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.06%	18.26%	-6.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.88%	17.22%	-7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.87%	20.17%	-10.30%