BGHSX vs. DODLX
Compare and contrast key facts about BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund (DODLX).
BGHSX is managed by Franklin Templeton Investments. It was launched on Dec 3, 2014. DODLX is managed by Dodge & Cox. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGHSX or DODLX.
Correlation
The correlation between BGHSX and DODLX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGHSX vs. DODLX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BGHSX:
1.57
DODLX:
1.29
BGHSX:
2.23
DODLX:
1.90
BGHSX:
1.38
DODLX:
1.23
BGHSX:
1.33
DODLX:
1.09
BGHSX:
5.27
DODLX:
2.70
BGHSX:
1.14%
DODLX:
2.51%
BGHSX:
3.79%
DODLX:
5.26%
BGHSX:
-18.15%
DODLX:
-17.05%
BGHSX:
-2.65%
DODLX:
-0.70%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGHSX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than DODLX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BGHSX has underperformed DODLX with an annualized return of 1.97%, while DODLX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.72% annualized return.
BGHSX
-0.85%
1.95%
0.19%
5.91%
4.91%
1.97%
DODLX
4.77%
1.96%
2.57%
6.77%
3.98%
3.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGHSX vs. DODLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGHSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than DODLX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGHSX vs. DODLX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BGHSX
DODLX
BGHSX vs. DODLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund (DODLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGHSX vs. DODLX - Dividend Comparison
BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than DODLX's 4.60% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 7.62% | 7.39% | 6.95% | 6.34% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DODLX Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund | 4.60% | 4.73% | 3.31% | 5.05% | 2.49% | 2.21% | 3.40% | 4.21% | 2.34% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 1.40% |
Drawdowns
BGHSX vs. DODLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than DODLX's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and DODLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGHSX vs. DODLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) is 1.28%, while Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund (DODLX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that BGHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DODLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with BGHSX or DODLX
Recent discussions
Feature Request: Screener alerts
Scott Allen
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca
technical support
Marcus Crahan