BFOR vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
BFOR and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BFOR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Barron's 400. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both BFOR and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BFOR or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between BFOR and SMH is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BFOR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BFOR:
1.12
SMH:
1.18
BFOR:
1.64
SMH:
1.69
BFOR:
1.21
SMH:
1.21
BFOR:
2.18
SMH:
1.66
BFOR:
6.32
SMH:
4.10
BFOR:
2.78%
SMH:
10.05%
BFOR:
15.70%
SMH:
34.93%
BFOR:
-41.26%
SMH:
-95.73%
BFOR:
-7.04%
SMH:
-11.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 42.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOR has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 9.79%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.76% annualized return.
BFOR
18.75%
-6.46%
11.43%
17.85%
12.61%
9.79%
SMH
42.05%
4.26%
-4.72%
41.28%
29.85%
27.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFOR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BFOR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BFOR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while SMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.72% | 0.18% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
BFOR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.26%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BFOR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) is 4.68%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that BFOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.