PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFLY vs. SATS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BFLY vs. SATS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) and EchoStar Corporation (SATS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFLY achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than SATS's 13.66% return.


BFLY

1D
-0.43%
1M
-15.19%
YTD
20.53%
6M
67.15%
1Y
98.27%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
-18.41%
10Y*

SATS

1D
-3.04%
1M
0.30%
YTD
13.66%
6M
66.82%
1Y
578.47%
3Y*
95.64%
5Y*
34.68%
10Y*
83.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLY vs. SATS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
20.53%21.79%188.89%-56.10%-63.23%-66.20%99.90%
SATS
EchoStar Corporation
13.66%374.67%38.20%-0.66%-36.70%24.35%-15.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BFLY and SATS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2020

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BFLY:

$1.17B

SATS:

$35.71B

EPS

BFLY:

-$0.30

SATS:

-$80.77

PS Ratio

BFLY:

11.16

SATS:

2.40

PB Ratio

BFLY:

6.14

SATS:

6.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

BFLY:

$102.92M

SATS:

$14.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BFLY:

$50.64M

SATS:

$5.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

BFLY:

-$70.00M

SATS:

-$16.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFLY vs. SATS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLY
BFLY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SATS
SATS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SATS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SATS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SATS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SATS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SATS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLY vs. SATS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) and EchoStar Corporation (SATS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFLYSATSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

5.44

-4.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

6.11

-3.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.81

-0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

29.97

-28.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

55.56

-51.81

BFLY vs. SATS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the SATS Sharpe Ratio of 5.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFLY and SATS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFLYSATSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

5.44

-4.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.50

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.01

-0.14

Drawdowns

BFLY vs. SATS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLY drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than SATS's maximum drawdown of -78.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLY and SATS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFLYSATSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.40%

-78.33%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.04%

-19.91%

-29.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.20%

-59.22%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.23%

-68.02%

-27.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.12%

-12.87%

-70.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.95%

-31.24%

-44.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.24%

10.74%

+13.50%

Volatility

BFLY vs. SATS - Volatility Comparison

Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) has a higher volatility of 20.60% compared to EchoStar Corporation (SATS) at 17.13%. This indicates that BFLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SATS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFLYSATSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.60%

17.13%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.58%

41.48%

+28.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.46%

107.41%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.55%

69.07%

+28.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.72%

4,552.27%

-4,457.55%

Dividends

BFLY vs. SATS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFLY nor SATS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SATS
EchoStar Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%85.50%

Financials

BFLY vs. SATS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Butterfly Network, Inc. and EchoStar Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
26.53M
3.67B
(BFLY) Total Revenue
(SATS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BFLY vs. SATS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Butterfly Network, Inc. and EchoStar Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
68.9%
45.5%
Portfolio components
BFLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Butterfly Network, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.29M and revenue of 26.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

SATS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

BFLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Butterfly Network, Inc. reported an operating income of -13.87M and revenue of 26.53M, resulting in an operating margin of -52.3%.

SATS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported an operating income of 392.85M and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

BFLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Butterfly Network, Inc. reported a net income of -12.68M and revenue of 26.53M, resulting in a net margin of -47.8%.

SATS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported a net income of -189.14M and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFLY and SATS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFLY has higher volatility (20.60%) compared to SATS (17.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFLY dropped -97.40% vs SATS's -78.33%.

SATS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFLY and SATS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer