BFIT vs. XLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Health & Wellness ETF (BFIT) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV).
BFIT and XLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BFIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Health & Wellness Thematic Index. It was launched on May 9, 2016. XLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Health Care Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both BFIT and XLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BFIT or XLV.
Correlation
The correlation between BFIT and XLV is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BFIT vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
BFIT
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
XLV
1.14%
-4.10%
-6.08%
0.63%
8.43%
8.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFIT vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFIT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BFIT vs. XLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BFIT
XLV
BFIT vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Health & Wellness ETF (BFIT) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BFIT vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
BFIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFIT Global X Health & Wellness ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 0.93% | 0.65% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.49% | 0.87% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.69% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.58% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Drawdowns
BFIT vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
BFIT vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Health & Wellness ETF (BFIT) is 0.00%, while Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that BFIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.