PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFGFX vs. OBMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFGFX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than OBMCX's 35.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BFGFX having a 20.27% annualized return and OBMCX not far behind at 20.12%.


BFGFX

1D
-2.26%
1M
-8.19%
6M
3.60%
YTD
-0.09%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
20.27%
ALL TIME*
13.61%

OBMCX

1D
5.04%
1M
-6.99%
6M
28.25%
YTD
35.57%
1Y
52.75%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
18.01%
10Y*
20.12%
ALL TIME*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
-0.09%21.94%29.52%27.40%-28.21%18.67%122.38%30.05%3.76%26.36%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
35.57%14.70%22.82%18.87%-10.57%53.20%29.91%21.94%-12.04%27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BFGFX and OBMCX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2004

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between BFGFX and OBMCX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFGFX vs. OBMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFGFX
BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

OBMCX
OBMCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
OBMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
OBMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFGFXOBMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.99

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

12.18

-9.40

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the OBMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFGFX and OBMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFGFX drawdown since its inception was -59.52%, smaller than the maximum OBMCX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFGFX and OBMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFGFXOBMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.52%

-68.24%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.49%

-17.19%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-28.11%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.93%

-28.11%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.62%

-50.04%

+6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.67%

-13.01%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-16.36%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

4.21%

+0.84%

Volatility

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) is 7.16%, while Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that BFGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OBMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFGFXOBMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

11.67%

-4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.27%

23.58%

-6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

28.71%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.99%

26.80%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.28%

26.25%

-1.97%

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFGFX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than OBMCX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFGFX vs. OBMCX - Dividend Comparison

BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OBMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.28%15.53%2.85%1.78%1.07%2.11%6.02%5.80%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
1.04%1.41%2.53%0.00%1.37%24.35%0.00%0.00%19.67%11.76%0.05%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFGFX and OBMCX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBMCX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to BFGFX (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFGFX dropped -59.52% vs OBMCX's -68.24%.

OBMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFGFX and OBMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer