BETZ vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
BETZ and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both BETZ and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BETZ or VGT.
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and VGT is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BETZ vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BETZ:
0.97
VGT:
1.46
BETZ:
1.44
VGT:
1.95
BETZ:
1.18
VGT:
1.26
BETZ:
0.37
VGT:
2.08
BETZ:
3.35
VGT:
7.34
BETZ:
5.54%
VGT:
4.31%
BETZ:
19.05%
VGT:
21.72%
BETZ:
-60.82%
VGT:
-54.63%
BETZ:
-40.95%
VGT:
-3.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 0.91% return.
BETZ
1.03%
0.57%
10.85%
12.72%
N/A
N/A
VGT
0.91%
1.00%
9.84%
29.13%
20.32%
21.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BETZ vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BETZ vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BETZ
VGT
BETZ vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BETZ vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than VGT's 0.59% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.59% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BETZ vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.62%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.