BETZ vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BETZ returned -8.72%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for VGT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

BETZ vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -10.44% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return.

BETZ

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: -10.44%
• 6M: -10.50%
• 1Y: -12.49%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: -8.72%
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 23.32%
• 6M: 21.50%
• 1Y: 46.82%
• 3Y*: 30.13%
• 5Y*: 19.51%
• 10Y*: 25.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETZ vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-10.44%	15.75%	10.22%	21.17%	-42.02%	-3.91%	65.99%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	23.32%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	33.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and VGT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between BETZ and VGT has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BETZ vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BETZ	VGT
Consumer Cyclical	96.0%	0.1%
Technology	2.9%	98.5%
Communication Services	1.1%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BETZ vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 58
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETZ vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETZ	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	2.07	-2.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.74	2.61	-3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.35	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	2.87	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	8.76	-9.47

BETZ vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETZ	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-54.63%	-6.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.20%	-16.40%	-12.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.20%	-27.23%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.79%	-35.07%	-24.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.41%	-7.71%	-31.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.82%	-7.95%	-25.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.59%	5.36%	+12.23%

Volatility

BETZ vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 6.83%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETZ	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	11.39%	-4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.62%	18.58%	-1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.78%	22.72%	-1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.00%	25.55%	+1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.95%	24.77%	+3.18%

BETZ vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETZ vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	5.11%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETZ and VGT in my portfolio?

BETZ and VGT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETZ or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to BETZ (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which ETF is better, BETZ or VGT?

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 19.51% vs -8.72% for BETZ. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETZ or VGT?

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs -8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETZ or VGT?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETZ or VGT?

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

What is the main difference between BETZ and VGT?

BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.09% for VGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.