PortfoliosLab logo
BERY vs. GLW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BERY and GLW is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

BERY vs. GLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
5.68%
-8.34%
BERY
GLW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BERY:

1.12

GLW:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

BERY:

1.67

GLW:

1.15

Omega Ratio

BERY:

1.21

GLW:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

BERY:

1.09

GLW:

0.39

Martin Ratio

BERY:

6.03

GLW:

3.27

Ulcer Index

BERY:

4.02%

GLW:

7.08%

Daily Std Dev

BERY:

21.57%

GLW:

32.31%

Max Drawdown

BERY:

-55.78%

GLW:

-99.02%

Current Drawdown

BERY:

-9.08%

GLW:

-47.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BERY:

$7.69B

GLW:

$33.47B

EPS

BERY:

$4.52

GLW:

$0.58

PE Ratio

BERY:

14.69

GLW:

67.36

PEG Ratio

BERY:

1.19

GLW:

0.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

BERY:

$8.71B

GLW:

$10.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BERY:

$1.61B

GLW:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

BERY:

$1.15B

GLW:

$1.70B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERY achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than GLW's -17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BERY has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 7.77%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.


BERY

YTD

3.12%

1M

-7.17%

6M

9.51%

1Y

24.79%

5Y*

18.64%

10Y*

7.77%

GLW

YTD

-17.31%

1M

-16.94%

6M

-11.92%

1Y

23.88%

5Y*

20.42%

10Y*

8.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Berry Global Group, Inc.

Corning Incorporated

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BERY vs. GLW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BERY is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BERY is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BERY is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BERY is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BERY is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BERY is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GLW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLW is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLW is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLW is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLW is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLW is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLW is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BERY vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BERY, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
BERY: 0.85
GLW: 0.92
The chart of Sortino ratio for BERY, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
BERY: 1.34
GLW: 1.45
The chart of Omega ratio for BERY, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BERY: 1.17
GLW: 1.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for BERY, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
BERY: 0.87
GLW: 1.14
The chart of Martin ratio for BERY, currently valued at 4.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
BERY: 4.59
GLW: 4.09

The current BERY Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the GLW Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERY and GLW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.85
0.92
BERY
GLW

Dividends

BERY vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison

BERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than GLW's 2.87% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BERY
Berry Global Group, Inc.
1.74%1.65%1.52%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLW
Corning Incorporated
2.69%2.36%3.68%3.38%2.58%2.44%2.75%2.38%1.94%2.22%2.63%1.74%

Drawdowns

BERY vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERY drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERY and GLW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.68%
-22.71%
BERY
GLW

Volatility

BERY vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY) is 10.28%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 18.27%. This indicates that BERY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
10.28%
18.27%
BERY
GLW

Financials

BERY vs. GLW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Berry Global Group, Inc. and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.50B3.00B3.50BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
2.39B
3.50B
(BERY) Total Revenue
(GLW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

User Portfolios with BERY or GLW


hyield
-6%
YTD
LYB
BCE
OMC
VZ
F
QSR
K
PM
CVX
ENB
XOM
PSX
VLO
C
KEY
LAZ
PRU
SLF
TFC
GILD
PFE
SNY
LMT
CCI
SPG
GLW
IBM
DUK
EIX
SO
test
-7%
YTD
AMT
GLW
OMF
NYCB
VYM
MBGYY
DVN
F
KMI
BP
IPKW
PFE
MRK
BOAT
USD=X
1 / 7

Recent discussions

Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio

Do the screens just pick the 10 stock portfolio & has the selection been the same for awhile? Seems like a no-brainer way to go based on performance, ease, expense. Just trying to get some clarity on this lazy portfolio.

4803heights

April 05, 25 Posted in general
329

How is Sharpe ratio calculated?

The highest sharpe ratio portfolioi in User portfolios holds only ultrashort treasuries and show a sharpe ratio of 7+. But my understanding is the Sharpe ratio is the return less the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation of returns. But short-term treasuries ARE the risk free rate, so the Sharpe ratio should be zero since the risk free rate minus the risk free rate is zero. So are you simply ignoring the risk-free rate and dividing returns by the standard deviation???

Addendum:

Just input my portfolio and asked that your site optimize it for Sharpe ratio. I have ready cash in USFR, and ETF that holds US floating rate notes exclusively. The optimization recommended I put over 99% in USFR. However, the interest rate on floating rate notes is based on the three month treasury, so again, USFR has a Sharpe ratio of zero! Please correct this!

Bob Peticolas

December 12, 23 Posted in general
945

Start and end date for portfolio performance & analysis

Hi All

This is an amazing tool! The only feature that I can't see is the option to add a start and end date (month or year) for portfolio calculations (for example: from December 2024 to January 2025). Is that something I'm missing?

Thanks,

John

John Harrison

February 14, 25 Posted in general
75