BERY vs. GLW
Compare and contrast key facts about Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY) and Corning Incorporated (GLW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BERY or GLW.
Correlation
The correlation between BERY and GLW is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
BERY vs. GLW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BERY:
1.12
GLW:
0.72
BERY:
1.67
GLW:
1.15
BERY:
1.21
GLW:
1.16
BERY:
1.09
GLW:
0.39
BERY:
6.03
GLW:
3.27
BERY:
4.02%
GLW:
7.08%
BERY:
21.57%
GLW:
32.31%
BERY:
-55.78%
GLW:
-99.02%
BERY:
-9.08%
GLW:
-47.87%
Fundamentals
BERY:
$7.69B
GLW:
$33.47B
BERY:
$4.52
GLW:
$0.58
BERY:
14.69
GLW:
67.36
BERY:
1.19
GLW:
0.42
BERY:
$8.71B
GLW:
$10.14B
BERY:
$1.61B
GLW:
$3.27B
BERY:
$1.15B
GLW:
$1.70B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERY achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than GLW's -17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BERY has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 7.77%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.
BERY
3.12%
-7.17%
9.51%
24.79%
18.64%
7.77%
GLW
-17.31%
-16.94%
-11.92%
23.88%
20.42%
8.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BERY vs. GLW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BERY
GLW
BERY vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BERY vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison
BERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than GLW's 2.87% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERY Berry Global Group, Inc. | 1.74% | 1.65% | 1.52% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 2.69% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
BERY vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERY drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERY and GLW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BERY vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY) is 10.28%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 18.27%. This indicates that BERY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BERY vs. GLW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Berry Global Group, Inc. and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
User Portfolios with BERY or GLW
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
How is Sharpe ratio calculated?
The highest sharpe ratio portfolioi in User portfolios holds only ultrashort treasuries and show a sharpe ratio of 7+. But my understanding is the Sharpe ratio is the return less the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation of returns. But short-term treasuries ARE the risk free rate, so the Sharpe ratio should be zero since the risk free rate minus the risk free rate is zero. So are you simply ignoring the risk-free rate and dividing returns by the standard deviation???
Addendum:
Just input my portfolio and asked that your site optimize it for Sharpe ratio. I have ready cash in USFR, and ETF that holds US floating rate notes exclusively. The optimization recommended I put over 99% in USFR. However, the interest rate on floating rate notes is based on the three month treasury, so again, USFR has a Sharpe ratio of zero! Please correct this!
Bob Peticolas
Start and end date for portfolio performance & analysis
Hi All
This is an amazing tool! The only feature that I can't see is the option to add a start and end date (month or year) for portfolio calculations (for example: from December 2024 to January 2025). Is that something I'm missing?
Thanks,
John
John Harrison