BEPC vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BEPC (Brookfield Renewable Corporation) is a stock, while BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Over the past year, BEPC returned 31.34% vs 29.53% for BOTZ. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BEPC vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEPC achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 11.15% return.

BEPC

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: 9.70%
• YTD: 2.51%
• 6M: -0.55%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEPC vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	2.51%	45.18%	-3.49%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	11.15%	14.17%	-2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BEPC and BOTZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2024	0.41

Return for Risk

BEPC vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEPC

BEPC Risk / Return Rank: 66
BEPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BEPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BEPC Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BEPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BEPC Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEPC vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEPC	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.24	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.87	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.22	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	1.53	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	5.26	-1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEPC vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEPC and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEPC	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	1.24	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.44	+0.38

Drawdowns

BEPC vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEPC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEPC and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEPC	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-55.54%	+35.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.92%	-19.34%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.38%	-3.27%	-8.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.26%	-18.32%	+12.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.22%	5.63%	+2.59%

Volatility

BEPC vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.77%. This indicates that BEPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEPC	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.16%	7.77%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.44%	18.40%	+8.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.80%	23.98%	+10.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.46%	26.73%	+8.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.46%	25.73%	+9.73%

Dividends

BEPC vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

BEPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	3.97%	3.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.59%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEPC and BOTZ in my portfolio?

BEPC and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEPC or BOTZ?

BEPC has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to BOTZ (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEPC dropped -19.92% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.