BELFB vs. COST
BELFB (Bel Fuse Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. BELFB operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BELFB returned 32.20%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for COST. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BELFB vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BELFB achieves a 73.48% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BELFB has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 32.20%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 20.89% annualized return.
BELFB
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- 6M
- 39.04%
- YTD
- 73.48%
- 1Y
- 123.53%
- 3Y*
- 80.78%
- 5Y*
- 83.00%
- 10Y*
- 32.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.07%
COST
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 0.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 20.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | $93.34M | $80.65M | $91.73M |
| $1.94B | $2.05B | $2.34B |
BELFB vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 73.48% | 106.32% | 24.03% | 104.19% | 158.73% | -12.33% | -24.84% | 13.09% | -25.89% | -17.68% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 9.72% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BELFB and COST is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 1998 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BELFB and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BELFB:
$3.56B
COST:
$417.75B
BELFB:
$5.45
COST:
$26.51
BELFB:
53.96
COST:
35.54
BELFB:
1.31
COST:
2.78
BELFB:
3.89
COST:
1.07
BELFB:
$744.09M
COST:
$293.59B
BELFB:
$294.08M
COST:
$11.12B
BELFB:
$100.21M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BELFB vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
BELFB
COST
BELFB vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BELFB | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.02 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | 0.02 | +4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.87 | 0.05 | +13.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BELFB vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BELFB drawdown since its inception was -81.89%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BELFB and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BELFB | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.89% | -53.39% | -28.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.19% | -16.57% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.37% | -20.74% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.49% | -31.40% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.79% | -31.40% | -48.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.70% | -13.78% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.73% | -13.36% | -23.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.94% | 7.94% | +1.00% |
Volatility
BELFB vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.81%. This indicates that BELFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BELFB | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | 6.81% | +12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.95% | 14.78% | +30.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.30% | 19.88% | +33.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.93% | 22.92% | +29.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.97% | 22.04% | +36.93% |
Dividends
BELFB vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
BELFB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than COST's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.34% | 0.42% | 0.85% | 2.17% | 1.86% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 0.91% | 1.62% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
Financials
BELFB vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bel Fuse Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BELFB vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
BELFB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a gross profit of 83.97M and revenue of 210.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
BELFB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported an operating income of 37.72M and revenue of 210.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
BELFB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a net income of 25.48M and revenue of 210.69M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BELFB and COST have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BELFB has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to COST (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BELFB dropped -81.89% vs COST's -53.39%.
BELFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BELFB and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer