BEKE vs. KWEB
BEKE (KE Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Over the past 5 years, BEKE returned -20.94%/yr vs -15.81%/yr for KWEB. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BEKE vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEKE achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -28.08% return.
BEKE
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 6M
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- -16.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- -20.94%
- 10Y*
- —
KWEB
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -28.08%
- 6M
- -29.18%
- 1Y
- -22.79%
- 3Y*
- 0.71%
- 5Y*
- -15.81%
- 10Y*
- -0.57%
BEKE vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEKE KE Holdings Inc. | -3.64% | -12.65% | 16.49% | 17.37% | -30.62% | -67.31% | 75.53% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -28.08% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 13.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEKE and KWEB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2020 | 0.68 |
The correlation between BEKE and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEKE vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
BEKE
KWEB
BEKE vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEKE | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.87 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.58 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | -1.22 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEKE vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEKE drawdown since its inception was -88.26%, which is greater than KWEB's maximum drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEKE and KWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEKE | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.26% | -80.92% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.26% | -39.49% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.39% | -39.49% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.58% | -72.17% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.05% | -71.68% | -7.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.95% | -35.36% | -32.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.65% | 18.70% | -4.05% |
Volatility
BEKE vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) has a higher volatility of 9.98% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 8.34%. This indicates that BEKE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEKE | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.98% | 8.34% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.24% | 20.47% | +7.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.20% | 27.17% | +9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.22% | 47.70% | +25.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.14% | 40.00% | +34.14% |
Dividends
BEKE vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
BEKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than KWEB's 8.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEKE KE Holdings Inc. | 1.85% | 2.28% | 1.91% | 1.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 8.56% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEKE and KWEB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEKE has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to KWEB (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEKE dropped -88.26% vs KWEB's -80.92%.
BEKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEKE and KWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer