PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEKE vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BEKE vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEKE achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -15.83% return.


BEKE

1D
-0.24%
1M
12.33%
6M
-7.78%
YTD
9.54%
1Y
-5.14%
3Y*
1.26%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-10.36%

BABA

1D
5.10%
1M
27.16%
6M
-27.24%
YTD
-15.83%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
-7.82%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.13B$1.37B$1.51B
$56.49M$58.46M$76.98M

BEKE vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BEKE
KE Holdings Inc.
9.54%-12.65%16.49%17.37%-30.62%-67.31%75.53%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-15.83%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%-8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BEKE and BABA is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2020

0.55

The correlation between BEKE and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BEKE:

$18.04B

BABA:

$293.02B

EPS

BEKE:

CN¥2.97

BABA:

CN¥33.85

PE Ratio

BEKE:

38.55

BABA:

24.38

PEG Ratio

BEKE:

0.31

BABA:

1.09

PS Ratio

BEKE:

1.45

BABA:

2.45

PB Ratio

BEKE:

2.02

BABA:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

BEKE:

CN¥90.03B

BABA:

CN¥811.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BEKE:

CN¥19.92B

BABA:

CN¥332.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

BEKE:

CN¥6.67B

BABA:

CN¥112.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEKE vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEKE
BEKE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BEKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEKE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BEKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEKE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEKE vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEKEBABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.05

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

0.05

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

0.09

-0.49

BEKE vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEKE Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEKE and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEKE vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEKE drawdown since its inception was -88.26%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEKE and BABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEKEBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.26%

-80.09%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.66%

-49.47%

+20.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.53%

-49.47%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.09%

-68.54%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.19%

-59.04%

-17.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.13%

-37.84%

-30.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

24.79%

-8.79%

Volatility

BEKE vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) is 9.84%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 14.17%. This indicates that BEKE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEKEBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

14.17%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.90%

29.11%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.24%

45.09%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.22%

51.60%

+19.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.62%

43.64%

+29.98%

Dividends

BEKE vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BEKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than BABA's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.86%1.36%1.96%1.29%
BEKE
KE Holdings Inc.
1.63%2.28%1.91%1.05%

Financials

BEKE vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KE Holdings Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BEKE vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KE Holdings Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BEKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KE Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 18.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

BEKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KE Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 18.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

BEKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KE Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 18.78B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BEKE and BABA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (14.17%) compared to BEKE (9.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEKE dropped -88.26% vs BABA's -80.09%.

BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEKE and BABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer