BEEM vs. INSG

In the year-to-date period, BEEM achieves a -59.38% return, which is significantly lower than INSG's 391.81% return. Over the past 10 years, BEEM has outperformed INSG with an annualized return of -9.14%, while INSG has yielded a comparatively lower -10.53% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beam Global (BEEM) and Inseego Corp. (INSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BEEM Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the INSG Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEEM and INSG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither BEEM nor INSG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BEEM drawdown since its inception was -96.34%, roughly equal to the maximum INSG drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEEM and INSG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Beam Global (BEEM) has a higher volatility of 22.64% compared to Inseego Corp. (INSG) at 15.61%. This indicates that BEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Beam Global and Inseego Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.