BEEM vs. FTCI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Beam Global (BEEM) and FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI).

Performance

BEEM vs. FTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beam Global (BEEM) and FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BEEM vs. FTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEEM Beam Global	-1.33%	-52.68%	-55.29%	-59.42%	-6.08%	-46.74%
FTCI FTC Solar, Inc.	-65.44%	98.00%	-20.47%	-74.15%	-64.55%	-46.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BEEM : $26.18M FTCI : $57.08M
EPS BEEM : -$1.77 FTCI : -$5.35
PS Ratio BEEM : 0.89 FTCI : 0.54
Total Revenue (TTM) BEEM : $27.67M FTCI : $99.69M
Gross Profit (TTM) BEEM : $4.14M FTCI : $1.13M
EBITDA (TTM) BEEM : -$14.12M FTCI : -$50.18M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEEM achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly higher than FTCI's -65.44% return.

BEEM

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -10.30%
• YTD: -1.33%
• 6M: -48.61%
• 1Y: -30.19%
• 3Y*: -54.69%
• 5Y*: -48.31%
• 10Y*: -15.79%

FTCI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -49.05%
• YTD: -65.44%
• 6M: -49.60%
• 1Y: 37.09%
• 3Y*: -44.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BEEM vs. FTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEEM

BEEM Risk / Return Rank: 29
BEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FTCI

FTCI Risk / Return Rank: 56
FTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEEM vs. FTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beam Global (BEEM) and FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEEM	FTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.31	0.36	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	1.27	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.16	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	0.45	-0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	1.40	-2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEEM vs. FTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEEM Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the FTCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEEM and FTCI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEEM	FTCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31	0.36	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	-0.45	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between BEEM and FTCI is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BEEM vs. FTCI - Dividend Comparison

Neither BEEM nor FTCI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BEEM vs. FTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEEM drawdown since its inception was -98.17%, roughly equal to the maximum FTCI drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEEM and FTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEEM	FTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.17%	-98.56%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.69%	-69.84%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.99%	-97.36%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.50%	-80.26%	+4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.12%	22.45%	+17.67%

Volatility

BEEM vs. FTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beam Global (BEEM) is 16.19%, while FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) has a volatility of 47.46%. This indicates that BEEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEEM	FTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.19%	47.46%	-31.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.66%	80.62%	-25.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.39%	104.78%	-8.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.42%	117.48%	-33.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.32%	117.48%	-28.16%

Financials