PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEEM vs. FTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BEEM vs. FTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beam Global (BEEM) and FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEEM achieves a -30.00% return, which is significantly higher than FTCI's -74.79% return.


BEEM

1D
0.96%
1M
-18.60%
6M
-34.37%
YTD
-30.00%
1Y
-54.74%
3Y*
-54.87%
5Y*
-49.05%
10Y*
-17.57%
ALL TIME*
-14.34%

FTCI

1D
4.56%
1M
-45.00%
6M
-73.51%
YTD
-74.79%
1Y
-54.01%
3Y*
-58.14%
5Y*
-51.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-53.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$774.79K$654.55K$1.99M
$839.50K$703.33K$746.17K

BEEM vs. FTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BEEM
Beam Global
-30.00%-52.68%-55.29%-59.42%-6.08%-46.04%
FTCI
FTC Solar, Inc.
-74.79%98.00%-20.47%-74.15%-64.55%-50.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BEEM and FTCI is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2021

0.37

The correlation between BEEM and FTCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BEEM:

$19.09M

FTCI:

$44.01M

EPS

BEEM:

-$1.57

FTCI:

-$2.32

PS Ratio

BEEM:

0.64

FTCI:

0.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

BEEM:

$28.24M

FTCI:

$96.15M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BEEM:

$3.52M

FTCI:

$3.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

BEEM:

-$13.13M

FTCI:

-$51.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Beam Global

FTC Solar, Inc.

Return for Risk

BEEM vs. FTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEEM
BEEM Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCI
FTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEEM vs. FTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beam Global (BEEM) and FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEEMFTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.99

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.66

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.05

-1.21

+0.15

BEEM vs. FTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEEM Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the FTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEEM and FTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEEM vs. FTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEEM drawdown since its inception was -98.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FTCI drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEEM and FTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEEMFTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.67%

-98.65%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.77%

-79.20%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.59%

-94.09%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.49%

-98.15%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.58%

-98.19%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.94%

-82.41%

+6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.09%

43.04%

+9.05%

Volatility

BEEM vs. FTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beam Global (BEEM) is 16.92%, while FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) has a volatility of 30.85%. This indicates that BEEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEEMFTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.92%

30.85%

-13.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.60%

86.29%

-30.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.11%

113.57%

-29.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.26%

118.93%

-34.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.84%

117.23%

-28.39%

Dividends

BEEM vs. FTCI - Dividend Comparison

Neither BEEM nor FTCI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BEEM vs. FTCI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Beam Global and FTC Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BEEM and FTCI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCI has higher volatility (30.85%) compared to BEEM (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEEM dropped -98.67% vs FTCI's -98.65%.

FTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEEM and FTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer