BEEM vs. EME

In the year-to-date period, BEEM achieves a -59.38% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 116.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BEEM has underperformed EME with an annualized return of -9.14%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 27.09% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beam Global (BEEM) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BEEM Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEEM and EME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BEEM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

The maximum BEEM drawdown since its inception was -96.34%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEEM and EME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Beam Global (BEEM) has a higher volatility of 22.64% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 9.00%. This indicates that BEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Beam Global and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.