BE vs. NRG
Compare and contrast key facts about Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BE or NRG.
Key characteristics
BE | NRG | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.74 | 3.13 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.93 | 3.66 |
Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.49 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.88 | 5.64 |
Martin Ratio | 2.45 | 18.91 |
Ulcer Index | 28.52% | 5.80% |
Daily Std Dev | 94.15% | 35.06% |
Max Drawdown | -92.54% | -79.41% |
Current Drawdown | -38.71% | -2.46% |
Fundamentals
BE | NRG | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.93B | $18.61B |
EPS | -$0.54 | $4.04 |
PEG Ratio | 3.12 | 2.40 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $28.09B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $314.92M | $5.40B |
EBITDA (TTM) | -$14.23M | $9.91B |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and NRG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BE vs. NRG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 76.62% return, which is significantly lower than NRG's 96.18% return.
BE
76.62%
162.98%
74.03%
68.43%
36.87%
N/A
NRG
96.18%
14.29%
28.62%
110.95%
24.99%
16.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BE vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BE vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison
BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRG Energy, Inc. | 1.65% | 2.92% | 4.40% | 3.02% | 3.20% | 0.30% | 0.30% | 0.42% | 1.92% | 4.93% | 2.00% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
BE vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and NRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BE vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 51.10% compared to NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) at 13.44%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BE vs. NRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities