PortfoliosLab logo
BE vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BE and LNG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BE vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-33.88%
284.56%
BE
LNG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BE:

0.40

LNG:

1.83

Sortino Ratio

BE:

1.43

LNG:

2.28

Omega Ratio

BE:

1.17

LNG:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

BE:

0.51

LNG:

2.41

Martin Ratio

BE:

1.48

LNG:

7.63

Ulcer Index

BE:

27.07%

LNG:

6.95%

Daily Std Dev

BE:

99.14%

LNG:

29.12%

Max Drawdown

BE:

-92.54%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

BE:

-61.24%

LNG:

-5.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BE:

$3.79B

LNG:

$52.54B

EPS

BE:

$0.02

LNG:

$14.19

PE Ratio

BE:

816.00

LNG:

16.62

PEG Ratio

BE:

1.48

LNG:

2.10

PS Ratio

BE:

2.42

LNG:

3.40

PB Ratio

BE:

6.55

LNG:

9.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

BE:

$1.56B

LNG:

$11.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BE:

$492.48M

LNG:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

BE:

$100.24M

LNG:

$3.65B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a -25.57% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 11.37% return.


BE

YTD

-25.57%

1M

-4.12%

6M

50.68%

1Y

40.44%

5Y*

14.84%

10Y*

N/A

LNG

YTD

11.37%

1M

18.08%

6M

21.21%

1Y

54.28%

5Y*

41.13%

10Y*

12.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BE vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BE is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BE is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BE is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BE is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BE is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BE is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BE vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.41
1.88
BE
LNG

Dividends

BE vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


TTM2024202320222021
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.78%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%

Drawdowns

BE vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-61.24%
-5.66%
BE
LNG

Volatility

BE vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 10.07%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
17.28%
10.07%
BE
LNG

Financials

BE vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
326.02M
4.44B
(BE) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BE vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
27.2%
42.6%
(BE) Gross Margin
(LNG) Gross Margin
BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 88.71M and revenue of 326.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.89B and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of -19.07M and revenue of 326.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.9%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.74B and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.2%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of -23.81M and revenue of 326.02M, resulting in a net margin of -7.3%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 977.00M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.