PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BE vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BE and LNG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

BE vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
63.31%
26.25%
BE
LNG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BE:

0.63

LNG:

1.02

Sortino Ratio

BE:

1.77

LNG:

1.60

Omega Ratio

BE:

1.20

LNG:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

BE:

0.75

LNG:

1.26

Martin Ratio

BE:

2.14

LNG:

3.57

Ulcer Index

BE:

28.04%

LNG:

5.61%

Daily Std Dev

BE:

94.65%

LNG:

19.72%

Max Drawdown

BE:

-92.54%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

BE:

-46.35%

LNG:

-8.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BE:

$5.66B

LNG:

$47.27B

EPS

BE:

-$0.54

LNG:

$15.73

PEG Ratio

BE:

2.75

LNG:

0.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

BE:

$1.26B

LNG:

$16.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BE:

$314.92M

LNG:

$9.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

BE:

-$14.23M

LNG:

$8.11B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 54.59% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 21.89% return.


BE

YTD

54.59%

1M

-3.66%

6M

63.31%

1Y

65.32%

5Y*

28.42%

10Y*

N/A

LNG

YTD

21.89%

1M

-6.41%

6M

26.24%

1Y

21.63%

5Y*

28.40%

10Y*

11.76%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BE vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BE, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.631.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for BE, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.771.60
The chart of Omega ratio for BE, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.201.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for BE, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.751.26
The chart of Martin ratio for BE, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.002.143.57
BE
LNG

The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.63
1.02
BE
LNG

Dividends

BE vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


TTM202320222021
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.88%0.95%0.92%0.33%

Drawdowns

BE vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-46.35%
-8.84%
BE
LNG

Volatility

BE vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 20.41% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 6.08%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
20.41%
6.08%
BE
LNG

Financials

BE vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab