BE vs. LNG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

Performance

BE vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BE vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BE Bloom Energy Corporation	52.43%	291.22%	50.07%	-22.59%	-12.81%	-23.48%	283.67%	-25.15%	-60.08%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	42.28%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	-8.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BE : $34.92B LNG : $59.28B
EPS BE : -$0.36 LNG : $24.33
PS Ratio BE : 15.95 LNG : 3.02
PB Ratio BE : 45.43 LNG : 7.49
Total Revenue (TTM) BE : $2.02B LNG : $19.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) BE : $625.18M LNG : $5.46B
EBITDA (TTM) BE : $20.05M LNG : $9.75B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 52.43% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 42.28% return.

BE

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -20.21%
• YTD: 52.43%
• 6M: 46.86%
• 1Y: 523.59%
• 3Y*: 88.01%
• 5Y*: 38.12%
• 10Y*: —

LNG

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: 10.81%
• YTD: 42.28%
• 6M: 19.47%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 32.08%
• 10Y*: 23.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BE vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE

BE Risk / Return Rank: 97
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 99

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 61
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BE vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BE	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.24	0.70	+4.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	1.11	+2.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.15	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.49	0.91	+11.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	37.14	2.08	+35.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BE vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 5.24, which is higher than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BE	LNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.24	0.70	+4.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	1.08	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.17	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between BE and LNG is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BE vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BE Bloom Energy Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.76%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%

Drawdowns

BE vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BE	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.54%	-97.84%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.94%	-22.34%	-23.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.87%	-24.87%	-51.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.21%	-7.10%	-17.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.10%	-43.34%	-9.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.45%	9.79%	+5.66%

Volatility

BE vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 34.42% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 11.79%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BE	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.42%	11.79%	+22.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.27%	18.41%	+61.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	101.11%	29.65%	+71.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.20%	29.90%	+54.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.46%	32.96%	+61.50%

Financials

BE vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 239.90M and revenue of 777.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.9%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 87.53M and revenue of 777.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.74B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 83.7%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.09M and revenue of 777.68M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 40.6%.