BE vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BE or ET.
Key characteristics
| BE | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -22.70% | 16.92% |
| 1Y Return | -30.67% | 36.96% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -22.79% | 32.62% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.61% | 10.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.44 | 2.46 |
| Daily Std Dev | 64.42% | 14.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.54% | -87.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -73.18% | -5.94% |
Fundamentals
| BE | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.39B | $53.75B |
| EPS | -$1.42 | $1.09 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.19 | 0.58 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $78.59B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $257.59M | $13.42B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$33.50M | $12.69B |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and ET is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BE vs. ET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a -22.70% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 16.92% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BE vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BE vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.89% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
BE vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BE vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.98%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BE vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities