PortfoliosLab logo
BE vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BE and ET is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BE vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BE:

0.11

ET:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

BE:

0.98

ET:

1.21

Omega Ratio

BE:

1.11

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

BE:

0.15

ET:

0.88

Martin Ratio

BE:

0.42

ET:

2.70

Ulcer Index

BE:

27.87%

ET:

7.97%

Daily Std Dev

BE:

96.62%

ET:

27.54%

Max Drawdown

BE:

-92.54%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

BE:

-56.69%

ET:

-14.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BE:

$4.55B

ET:

$60.95B

EPS

BE:

$0.02

ET:

$1.31

PE Ratio

BE:

928.50

ET:

13.50

PEG Ratio

BE:

1.55

ET:

0.82

PS Ratio

BE:

2.91

ET:

0.74

PB Ratio

BE:

7.46

ET:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

BE:

$1.56B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BE:

$492.48M

ET:

$15.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

BE:

$100.24M

ET:

$15.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly lower than ET's -7.58% return.


BE

YTD

-16.84%

1M

0.82%

6M

-32.71%

1Y

11.00%

3Y*

1.78%

5Y*

18.13%

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-7.58%

1M

7.72%

6M

-8.84%

1Y

21.09%

3Y*

24.55%

5Y*

26.96%

10Y*

1.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bloom Energy Corporation

Energy Transfer LP

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BE vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BE is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BE is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BE is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BE is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BE is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BE is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BE vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BE vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.41%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

BE vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and ET.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BE vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 17.83% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 9.56%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BE vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
326.02M
21.02B
(BE) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BE vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
27.2%
19.4%
(BE) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 88.71M and revenue of 326.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of -19.07M and revenue of 326.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.9%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of -23.81M and revenue of 326.02M, resulting in a net margin of -7.3%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.