PortfoliosLab logo
BDN vs. CRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BDN and CRT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BDN vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BDN:

0.05

CRT:

-0.52

Sortino Ratio

BDN:

0.20

CRT:

-0.48

Omega Ratio

BDN:

1.03

CRT:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

BDN:

-0.02

CRT:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

BDN:

-0.07

CRT:

-0.82

Ulcer Index

BDN:

18.75%

CRT:

23.99%

Daily Std Dev

BDN:

36.57%

CRT:

40.71%

Max Drawdown

BDN:

-97.00%

CRT:

-83.46%

Current Drawdown

BDN:

-58.79%

CRT:

-58.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDN:

$740.70M

CRT:

$62.46M

EPS

BDN:

-$1.20

CRT:

$1.00

PEG Ratio

BDN:

14.94

CRT:

0.00

PS Ratio

BDN:

2.37

CRT:

9.43

PB Ratio

BDN:

0.76

CRT:

24.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDN:

$500.55M

CRT:

$9.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDN:

$268.86M

CRT:

$7.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

BDN:

-$231.13M

CRT:

$4.28M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a -18.86% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed CRT with an annualized return of -4.75%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.


BDN

YTD

-18.86%

1M

12.96%

6M

-14.91%

1Y

1.65%

3Y*

-16.45%

5Y*

-5.84%

10Y*

-4.75%

CRT

YTD

8.25%

1M

1.18%

6M

8.34%

1Y

-20.88%

3Y*

-9.37%

5Y*

17.53%

10Y*

3.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Brandywine Realty Trust

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDN vs. CRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDN is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDN is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDN is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDN is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDN is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDN is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRT is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRT is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRT is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRT is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRT is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRT is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDN vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDN and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BDN vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.05%, more than CRT's 8.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
14.05%10.71%13.33%12.36%5.66%6.38%4.83%5.59%3.52%3.76%4.39%3.75%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
8.56%9.55%10.97%7.69%9.70%9.44%10.05%13.08%6.86%5.90%10.41%15.33%

Drawdowns

BDN vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BDN vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 5.87%. This indicates that BDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BDN vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brandywine Realty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
121.52M
4.36M
(BDN) Total Revenue
(CRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items