BDN vs. CRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDN or CRT.
Key characteristics
| BDN | CRT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.18% | -38.84% |
| 1Y Return | 58.91% | -44.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -19.84% | -1.65% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -11.48% | 14.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -3.74% | -1.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | -1.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.88 | -1.66 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 0.80 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.76 | -0.65 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.91 | -1.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 13.68% | 34.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 42.28% | 39.72% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.00% | -83.46% |
| Current Drawdown | -52.67% | -61.34% |
Fundamentals
| BDN | CRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $929.98M | $60.60M |
| EPS | -$1.75 | $1.28 |
| PEG Ratio | 14.94 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $502.82M | $5.98M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $204.25M | $9.09M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$14.04M | $2.96M |
Correlation
The correlation between BDN and CRT is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BDN vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -38.84% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed CRT with an annualized return of -3.74%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively higher -1.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BDN vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BDN vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.49%, more than CRT's 10.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust | 11.49% | 13.33% | 12.36% | 5.66% | 6.38% | 4.83% | 5.59% | 3.52% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.75% | 4.26% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.73% | 10.97% | 7.69% | 9.70% | 9.44% | 10.05% | 13.08% | 6.86% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.33% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
BDN vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BDN vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a higher volatility of 18.20% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 8.61%. This indicates that BDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BDN vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brandywine Realty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities