PortfoliosLab logo
BDN vs. CRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BDN and CRT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

BDN vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%2,600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,610.19%
1,981.61%
BDN
CRT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BDN:

0.03

CRT:

-0.44

Sortino Ratio

BDN:

0.28

CRT:

-0.40

Omega Ratio

BDN:

1.04

CRT:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

BDN:

0.02

CRT:

-0.27

Martin Ratio

BDN:

0.06

CRT:

-0.76

Ulcer Index

BDN:

17.62%

CRT:

23.42%

Daily Std Dev

BDN:

36.53%

CRT:

40.74%

Max Drawdown

BDN:

-97.00%

CRT:

-83.46%

Current Drawdown

BDN:

-60.82%

CRT:

-59.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDN:

$704.68M

CRT:

$60.66M

EPS

BDN:

-$1.20

CRT:

$0.95

PEG Ratio

BDN:

14.94

CRT:

0.00

PS Ratio

BDN:

2.19

CRT:

9.53

PB Ratio

BDN:

0.69

CRT:

25.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDN:

$500.55M

CRT:

$4.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDN:

$268.86M

CRT:

$7.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

BDN:

-$237.21M

CRT:

$4.23M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a -22.85% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 4.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed CRT with an annualized return of -5.17%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively higher 0.64% annualized return.


BDN

YTD

-22.85%

1M

-6.45%

6M

-14.95%

1Y

-2.32%

5Y*

-8.79%

10Y*

-5.17%

CRT

YTD

4.51%

1M

-14.28%

6M

6.50%

1Y

-17.81%

5Y*

21.89%

10Y*

0.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDN vs. CRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDN is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDN is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDN is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDN is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDN is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDN is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRT is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRT is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRT is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRT is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRT is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRT is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDN vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDN, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
BDN: 0.03
CRT: -0.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDN, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
BDN: 0.28
CRT: -0.40
The chart of Omega ratio for BDN, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BDN: 1.04
CRT: 0.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDN, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
BDN: 0.02
CRT: -0.27
The chart of Martin ratio for BDN, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-40.00-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00
BDN: 0.06
CRT: -0.76

The current BDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDN and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.03
-0.44
BDN
CRT

Dividends

BDN vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.78%, more than CRT's 8.87% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
14.78%10.71%13.33%12.36%5.66%6.38%4.83%5.59%3.52%3.76%4.39%3.75%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
8.87%9.55%10.97%7.69%9.70%9.44%10.05%13.08%6.86%5.90%10.41%15.33%

Drawdowns

BDN vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-60.82%
-59.81%
BDN
CRT

Volatility

BDN vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) is 15.31%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 16.93%. This indicates that BDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.31%
16.93%
BDN
CRT

Financials

BDN vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brandywine Realty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
121.52M
1.46M
(BDN) Total Revenue
(CRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BDN vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brandywine Realty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
60.8%
100.0%
(BDN) Gross Margin
(CRT) Gross Margin
BDN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 73.93M and revenue of 121.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.
CRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 1.46M and revenue of 1.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BDN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported an operating income of 15.16M and revenue of 121.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.
CRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 1.30M and revenue of 1.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 89.1%.
BDN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a net income of -27.40M and revenue of 121.52M, resulting in a net margin of -22.6%.
CRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 1.32M and revenue of 1.46M, resulting in a net margin of 90.1%.