BDN vs. BSV
BDN (Brandywine Realty Trust) is a stock, while BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) is Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, BDN returned -8.45%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for BSV. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
BDN vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed BSV with an annualized return of -8.45%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively higher 1.90% annualized return.
BDN
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- -11.50%
- 3Y*
- -3.45%
- 5Y*
- -17.58%
- 10Y*
- -8.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.84%
BSV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.34M | $6.61M | $5.86M | |
| $124.18M | $168.72M | $200.19M |
BDN vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust | 13.10% | -41.31% | 17.13% | 1.73% | -50.65% | 19.50% | -19.06% | 28.95% | -26.04% | 14.42% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.42% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.98% | 1.34% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDN and BSV is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between BDN and BSV shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDN vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
BDN
BSV
BDN vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDN | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.31 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 2.33 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 7.21 | -7.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDN vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and BSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDN | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.84% | -8.54% | -88.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.44% | -1.29% | -42.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.26% | -1.53% | -54.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.17% | -8.48% | -64.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | -8.54% | -64.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.29% | -0.50% | -65.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.34% | -0.97% | -38.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.01% | 0.42% | +25.59% |
Volatility
BDN vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.49%. This indicates that BDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDN | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 0.49% | +9.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.62% | 1.41% | +24.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.59% | 1.81% | +32.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.26% | 2.74% | +35.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.40% | 2.38% | +33.02% |
Dividends
BDN vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than BSV's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust | 10.53% | 18.15% | 10.71% | 13.33% | 12.36% | 5.66% | 6.38% | 4.83% | 5.59% | 3.52% | 3.76% | 4.39% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 3.68% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDN and BSV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDN has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to BSV (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDN dropped -96.84% vs BSV's -8.54%.
BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDN and BSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer