PortfoliosLab logo
BDGS vs. CFCV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BDGS and CFCV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

BDGS vs. CFCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF (CFCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%22.00%24.00%26.00%28.00%30.00%32.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
27.80%
28.61%
BDGS
CFCV

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


BDGS

YTD

-0.90%

1M

-1.29%

6M

3.70%

1Y

15.17%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CFCV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BDGS vs. CFCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CFCV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BDGS: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for CFCV: current value is 0.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CFCV: 0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDGS vs. CFCV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CFCV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CFCV is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CFCV is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CFCV is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CFCV is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CFCV is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CFCV is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDGS vs. CFCV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF (CFCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BDGS: 1.35
CFCV: 0.94
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BDGS: 2.16
CFCV: 1.31
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
BDGS: 1.40
CFCV: 1.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
BDGS: 1.70
CFCV: 1.08
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 8.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
BDGS: 8.29
CFCV: 5.48


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.35
0.94
BDGS
CFCV

Dividends

BDGS vs. CFCV - Dividend Comparison

BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while CFCV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.83%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CFCV
ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF
1.02%1.22%1.37%2.78%4.94%1.76%

Drawdowns

BDGS vs. CFCV - Drawdown Comparison


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-3.52%
-0.43%
BDGS
CFCV

Volatility

BDGS vs. CFCV - Volatility Comparison

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF (CFCV) at 0.00%. This indicates that BDGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.10%
0
BDGS
CFCV