PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
BDGS vs. CFCV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

BDGS vs. CFCV

Last updated May 15, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF (CFCV).

BDGS and CFCV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023. CFCV is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 27, 2020.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDGS or CFCV.

Correlation

The correlation between BDGS and CFCV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BDGS vs. CFCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF (CFCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

BDGS

YTD

2.02%

1M

3.45%

6M

3.51%

1Y

17.38%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CFCV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BDGS vs. CFCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CFCV's 0.49% expense ratio.

BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
CFCV
ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDGS vs. CFCV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
CFCV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CFCV is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CFCV is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CFCV is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CFCV is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CFCV is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CFCV is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDGS vs. CFCV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF (CFCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Dividends

BDGS vs. CFCV - Dividend Comparison

BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while CFCV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF		1.77%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CFCV
ClearBridge Focus Value ESG ETF		1.02%1.22%1.37%2.78%4.94%1.76%

Drawdowns

BDGS vs. CFCV - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

BDGS vs. CFCV - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...