PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
BDGS vs. AHOY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

BDGS vs. AHOY

Last updated May 14, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Newday Ocean Health ETF (AHOY).

BDGS and AHOY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023. AHOY is an actively managed fund by Newday. It was launched on Jun 6, 2022.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDGS or AHOY.

Correlation

The correlation between BDGS and AHOY is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BDGS vs. AHOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Newday Ocean Health ETF (AHOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

BDGS

YTD

1.70%

1M

3.62%

6M

3.18%

1Y

17.09%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AHOY

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BDGS vs. AHOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AHOY's 0.75% expense ratio.

BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
AHOY
Newday Ocean Health ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDGS vs. AHOY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
AHOY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AHOY is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AHOY is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AHOY is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AHOY is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AHOY is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AHOY is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDGS vs. AHOY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Newday Ocean Health ETF (AHOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Dividends

BDGS vs. AHOY - Dividend Comparison

BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while AHOY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202420232022
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF		1.78%1.81%0.84%0.00%
AHOY
Newday Ocean Health ETF		98.94%98.94%0.57%0.42%

Drawdowns

BDGS vs. AHOY - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

BDGS vs. AHOY - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...