PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays PLC (BCS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCS
Barclays PLC
-15.86%96.49%76.26%6.01%-21.90%31.71%-12.84%31.90%-29.25%0.44%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-4.42%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a -15.86% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.78%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.


BCS

1D
4.70%
1M
-12.85%
YTD
-15.86%
6M
3.60%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
48.18%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
12.78%

VOO

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCS
BCS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCSVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

0.98

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.50

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.53

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

7.29

-1.87

BCS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.98

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.70

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.78

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.83

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between BCS and VOO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BCS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCS
Barclays PLC
2.21%1.70%3.13%4.86%4.18%1.61%3.91%3.68%3.21%1.37%2.26%2.95%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

BCS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-33.99%

-60.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-11.98%

-14.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.14%

-24.52%

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.10%

-33.99%

-32.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.43%

-6.29%

-31.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-3.72%

-34.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

2.52%

+4.90%

Volatility

BCS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.96%

5.29%

+6.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.39%

9.44%

+11.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.39%

18.10%

+13.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.89%

16.82%

+17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.72%

17.99%

+19.73%