PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCI vs. SVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCI vs. SVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 26.68% return, which is significantly higher than SVOL's -0.40% return.


BCI

1D
-0.12%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
26.68%
6M
25.55%
1Y
38.68%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*

SVOL

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
1.29%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCI vs. SVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
26.68%15.07%5.47%-8.79%15.09%7.98%
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
-0.40%2.41%6.77%22.88%-3.30%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BCI and SVOL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021

0.15

The correlation between BCI and SVOL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BCI vs. SVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BCI
SVOL

Financial Services

100.0%
11.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Communication Services

-

7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.1%

Energy

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

11.0%

Industrials

-

11.4%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Technology

-

31.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

BCI
100.0%
SVOL
11.4%

Basic Materials

BCI

-

SVOL
2.5%

Communication Services

BCI

-

SVOL
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BCI

-

SVOL
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

BCI

-

SVOL
5.1%

Energy

BCI

-

SVOL
4.8%

Healthcare

BCI

-

SVOL
11.0%

Industrials

BCI

-

SVOL
11.4%

Real Estate

BCI

-

SVOL
2.8%

Technology

BCI

-

SVOL
31.9%

Utilities

BCI

-

SVOL
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCI vs. SVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCI
BCI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SVOL
SVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCI vs. SVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCISVOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

0.51

+1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

0.85

+2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.12

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

0.82

+4.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.14

1.94

+11.20

BCI vs. SVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the SVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCI and SVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCISVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

0.51

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.31

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.35

+0.13

Drawdowns

BCI vs. SVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, roughly equal to the maximum SVOL drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and SVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCISVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.69%

-33.50%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-13.01%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.38%

-33.50%

+22.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

-33.50%

+7.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-2.98%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-4.77%

-7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

5.49%

-2.54%

Volatility

BCI vs. SVOL - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) at 1.41%. This indicates that BCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCISVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

1.41%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

9.57%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

20.90%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

21.99%

-5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

21.92%

-6.27%

BCI vs. SVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SVOL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCI vs. SVOL - Dividend Comparison

BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, less than SVOL's 22.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
13.01%16.49%3.29%3.93%19.98%19.43%0.68%1.47%1.13%5.02%
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
22.10%19.82%16.79%16.36%18.32%4.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCI and SVOL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to SVOL (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCI dropped -32.69% vs SVOL's -33.50%.

On 5-year performance, BCI leads with 11.07% vs 6.70% for SVOL. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BCI has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 6.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SVOL.

SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.10%, compared with 13.01% for BCI.

BCI is categorized as Commodities, while SVOL is Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCI and 0.50% for SVOL.

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCI and SVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer