BCI vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
BCI and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCI is an actively managed fund by Abrdn Plc. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BCI or SCHD.
Key characteristics
| BCI | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.60% | 3.21% |
| 1Y Return | 4.92% | 15.78% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.86% | 4.47% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.72% | 11.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.42 | 1.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.47% | 11.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.69% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.27% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCI and SCHD is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BCI vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 3.21% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCI vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BCI vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BCI vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than SCHD's 3.43% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 3.76% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.43% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
BCI vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BCI vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is 2.73%, while Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that BCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.