PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCHG vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCHG vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCHG vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
-25.23%-17.71%24.56%390.12%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-0.39%-20.46%97.86%42.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHG achieves a -25.23% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's -0.39% return.


BCHG

1D
-3.58%
1M
3.36%
YTD
-25.23%
6M
-31.54%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
56.05%
5Y*
-29.41%
10Y*

BITC

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-17.21%
1Y
-9.45%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCHG vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHG
BCHG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHG vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCHGBITCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

-0.36

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

-0.33

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.95

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

-0.36

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.14

-0.58

+2.73

BCHG vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHG and BITC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCHGBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

-0.36

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.64

-0.81

Correlation

The correlation between BCHG and BITC is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BCHG vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

BCHG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%.


TTM202520242023
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.38%3.36%42.68%5.82%

Drawdowns

BCHG vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHG drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHG and BITC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHGBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-38.51%

-60.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.91%

-26.51%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.26%

-31.54%

-62.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-15.81%

-70.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.19%

16.53%

+0.66%

Volatility

BCHG vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) have volatilities of 11.79% and 12.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCHGBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.79%

12.07%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.73%

19.16%

+33.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.17%

26.66%

+49.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.17%

47.60%

+65.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.73%

47.60%

+86.13%