PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCE.TO vs. ^TNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCE.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BCE Inc. (BCE.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCE.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCE.TO
BCE Inc.
9.06%5.35%-30.02%-6.21%-4.33%27.90%-3.92%17.39%-5.65%9.18%
^TNX
Treasury Yield 10 Years
5.06%-13.14%28.45%-2.53%174.83%63.40%-53.02%-32.07%21.16%-7.94%
Different Trading Currencies

BCE.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCE.TO achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 5.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BCE.TO has underperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 0.81%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.


BCE.TO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
9.06%
6M
10.64%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
-10.00%
5Y*
-2.86%
10Y*
0.81%

^TNX

1D
0.05%
1M
8.43%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.89%
1Y
0.97%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
23.30%
10Y*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCE.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCE.TO
BCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCE.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BCE Inc. (BCE.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCE.TO^TNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

0.05

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

0.21

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.02

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

-0.12

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.10

-0.20

+2.30

BCE.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCE.TO and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCE.TO^TNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

0.05

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.69

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.21

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

Correlation

The correlation between BCE.TO and ^TNX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

BCE.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -297.40%, which is greater than ^TNX's maximum drawdown of -84.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCE.TO and ^TNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCE.TO^TNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-297.40%

-93.78%

-203.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-13.99%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.01%

-31.74%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.01%

-84.57%

+34.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-225.40%

-46.17%

-179.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-135.11%

-51.38%

-83.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

8.39%

-2.37%

Volatility

BCE.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BCE Inc. (BCE.TO) is 4.45%, while Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that BCE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCE.TO^TNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

6.30%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

11.34%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

19.20%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

33.89%

-17.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

48.45%

-31.10%