BBUS vs. SCHA
Compare and contrast key facts about JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA).
BBUS and SCHA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBUS is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 2019. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both BBUS and SCHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBUS or SCHA.
Key characteristics
| BBUS | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 27.27% | 20.21% |
| 1Y Return | 38.30% | 43.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.79% | 2.76% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.98% | 11.19% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.27 | 2.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.31 | 3.13 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.62 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.74 | 1.79 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.72 | 13.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.86% | 3.36% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.31% | 19.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.35% | -42.41% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and SCHA is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BBUS vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 27.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 20.21% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBUS vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBUS vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBUS vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than SCHA's 2.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.18% | 1.39% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 2.10% | 2.52% | 2.21% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.70% | 2.33% | 1.24% | 2.18% | 2.61% | 2.16% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBUS vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 3.92%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.