PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSN.L vs. TCEHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Brave Bison Group plc (BBSN.L) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBSN.L
Brave Bison Group plc
7.19%68.79%-3.49%-4.44%57.89%39.02%-19.61%-42.05%144.44%-71.20%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-15.68%34.89%44.40%-10.20%-16.05%-17.92%45.68%17.29%-19.32%96.68%
Different Trading Currencies

BBSN.L is traded in GBp, while TCEHY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TCEHY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBSN.L:

£52.44M

TCEHY:

$578.07B

EPS

BBSN.L:

£0.09

TCEHY:

$24.17

PE Ratio

BBSN.L:

8.71

TCEHY:

2.58

PEG Ratio

BBSN.L:

0.05

TCEHY:

0.32

PS Ratio

BBSN.L:

0.76

TCEHY:

0.77

PB Ratio

BBSN.L:

2.21

TCEHY:

0.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBSN.L:

£69.43M

TCEHY:

$748.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBSN.L:

£44.26M

TCEHY:

$416.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

BBSN.L:

£5.30M

TCEHY:

$308.68B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSN.L achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than TCEHY's -15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BBSN.L has underperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of 0.35%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.24% annualized return.


BBSN.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.05%
YTD
7.19%
6M
-8.59%
1Y
50.18%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
0.35%

TCEHY

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
-15.68%
6M
-25.63%
1Y
-1.85%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
-2.48%
10Y*
14.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Brave Bison Group plc

Tencent Holdings Limited

Return for Risk

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSN.L
BBSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brave Bison Group plc (BBSN.L) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSN.LTCEHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

-0.06

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

0.14

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.02

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

-0.12

+2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.25

-0.29

+4.54

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSN.L and TCEHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSN.LTCEHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

-0.06

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.06

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

0.38

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.71

-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between BBSN.L and TCEHY is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

BBSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than TCEHY's 0.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSN.L
Brave Bison Group plc
0.54%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
0.93%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Drawdowns

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSN.L drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSN.L and TCEHY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSN.LTCEHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.16%

-73.17%

-25.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.18%

-30.12%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.81%

-68.59%

+17.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.34%

-73.17%

-13.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.50%

-29.87%

-65.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.86%

-19.55%

-70.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.54%

11.26%

+1.28%

Volatility

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brave Bison Group plc (BBSN.L) is 6.96%, while Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that BBSN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBSN.LTCEHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

14.60%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.01%

22.02%

+2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.04%

30.81%

+14.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.60%

41.71%

+7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

129.94%

37.98%

+91.96%

Financials

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brave Bison Group plc and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
17.80M
191.69B
(BBSN.L) Total Revenue
(TCEHY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BBSN.L values in GBp, TCEHY values in USD

BBSN.L vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brave Bison Group plc and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
67.7%
55.7%
Portfolio components
BBSN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brave Bison Group plc reported a gross profit of 12.04M and revenue of 17.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.79B and revenue of 191.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.7%.

BBSN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brave Bison Group plc reported an operating income of 1.63M and revenue of 17.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 58.21B and revenue of 191.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.

BBSN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brave Bison Group plc reported a net income of 147.00K and revenue of 17.80M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.46B and revenue of 191.69B, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.