PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSC vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSC vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 18.87% return.


BBSC

1D
1.52%
1M
2.61%
YTD
17.51%
6M
15.05%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*

VTWO

1D
1.53%
1M
3.33%
YTD
18.87%
6M
16.64%
1Y
41.90%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSC vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
17.51%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
18.87%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and VTWO is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.99

The correlation between BBSC and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSC vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBSC
VTWO

Technology

18.5%
17.0%

Financial Services

16.9%
15.7%

Healthcare

15.7%
16.5%

Industrials

14.9%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
8.4%

Real Estate

7.7%
6.1%

Energy

6.4%
6.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.4%

Utilities

1.2%
2.9%

Technology

BBSC
18.5%
VTWO
17.0%

Financial Services

BBSC
16.9%
VTWO
15.7%

Healthcare

BBSC
15.7%
VTWO
16.5%

Industrials

BBSC
14.9%
VTWO
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BBSC
9.0%
VTWO
8.4%

Real Estate

BBSC
7.7%
VTWO
6.1%

Energy

BBSC
6.4%
VTWO
6.1%

Basic Materials

BBSC
4.1%
VTWO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

BBSC
3.2%
VTWO
2.4%

Communication Services

BBSC
2.4%
VTWO
2.4%

Utilities

BBSC
1.2%
VTWO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSC vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSC vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSCVTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

3.83

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

13.62

-0.52

BBSC vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and VTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSCVTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.20

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.29

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.53

-0.03

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and VTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSCVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-41.19%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-10.99%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-27.57%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-31.88%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-8.39%

-3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.08%

-0.16%

Volatility

BBSC vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) is 4.88%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that BBSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSCVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

5.69%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

13.57%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

19.12%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.94%

22.49%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

23.08%

-0.22%

BBSC vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBSC vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than VTWO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.02%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.07%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BBSC and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to BBSC (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs VTWO's -41.19%.

On 5-year performance, BBSC leads with 6.97% vs 6.60% for VTWO. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BBSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBSC has performed better with a 6.97% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for BBSC.

VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 1.02% for BBSC.

BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.06% for VTWO.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSC and VTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer